20 years old. the event it portrays were already 20 years old-— the event it portrays were already 20 ears old. ~ , ., ., ., 20 years old. why do you want that? it's a known — 20 years old. why do you want that? it's a known story, _ 20 years old. why do you want that? it's a known story, and _ 20 years old. why do you want that? it's a known story, and it's _ 20 years old. why do you want that? it's a known story, and it's a - 20 years old. why do you want that? it's a known story, and it's a very - it's a known story, and it's a very special, so many symbols in that story that can relate to what's going on in the world right now, and with the way the world is shaped. and the way it's rigged. so i thought it was a very important not to forget about it, and actually the story that we heard was not a true story, so it was also about trying to tell the truth and memory. 50 story, so it was also about trying to tell the truth and memory. so you saw it as a — to tell the truth and memory. so you saw it as a way _ to tell the truth and memory. so you saw it as a way of _ saw it as a way of correcting the historical record?— saw it as a way of correcting the historical record? yeah, you know, it's something _ historical record? yeah, you know, it's something that _ historical record? yeah, you know, it's something that we _ historical record? yeah, you know, it's something that we heard - historical record? yeah, you know, it's something that we heard abouti it's something that we heard about and we heard a story and we discovered there was another story which is totally the opposite. and it's a government lie, so we need to expose it. it's a government lie, so we need to exose it. , expose it. the events portrayed are in new caledonia, _ expose it. the events portrayed are in new caledonia, one _ expose it. the events portrayed are in new caledonia, one of— expose it. the events portrayed are in new caledonia, one of the - expose it. the events portrayed are | in new caledonia, one of the former colonies of france, still has a constitutional relationship with friends, it's a hostagetaking situation where the character you play, the lead character, the police negotiator, feels he could have got a put peaceful outcome but because it's the eve of the 1988 french presidential election the talks have stopped in the military going, the police go in and there's bloodshed. since then though, quite a lot has changed in new caledonia. there is been a peace agreement between campaigners for independence and the people running the island, moving towards a referendum perhaps as soon as next year. were you not what reopening old wounds with this? that was the reopening old wounds with this? trust was the question, but actually, the purpose of the movie was to find closure for the caledonian's and also for the people, you know, for the army and maybe the politicians. we really wanted to gather everybody around the project that can start discussions. the problem is, nobody knows what happened and everybody is talking about their own experiences and they don't really know what happened, the global... story, so that's what we brought. and actually, it didn't open wounds at all. it is a way to get closure for the story they know and no—one else knows. the story they know and no-one else knows. ~ ., , , the story they know and no-one else knows. ~ . , , ., the story they know and no-one else knows. ~ ., , , ., ., ., knows. the kidnapped or who died at the time, knows. the kidnapped or who died at the time. said _ knows. the kidnapped or who died at the time, said it _ knows. the kidnapped or who died at the time, said it was _ knows. the kidnapped or who died at the time, said it was not _ knows. the kidnapped or who died at the time, said it was not polite - knows. the kidnapped or who died at the time, said it was not polite and l the time, said it was not polite and it was not respectful to make this film. and then when you had your attempt to film in new caledonia which you couldn't do, you went to polynesia, one of the prominent politicians went to fulfil your application, the population in new caledonia including among the residents of the island affected, he warned the impact of choosing such a sudden sensitive topic at a crucial period in the peace process, the people out there don't think you helped at all. people out there don't think you helped at all-— people out there don't think you heled at all. . �*, .,, , ., helped at all. that's was before the movie was released, _ helped at all. that's was before the movie was released, then - helped at all. that's was before the movie was released, then they - helped at all. that's was before the movie was released, then they saw| movie was released, then they saw the movie and they saw that it was... they were scared that the guy who did him was going to do a controversial movie, but it's not a controversy movie at all it's a balanced and that is trying to get as close to the truth, to reality as possible. no, controversiali as close to the truth, to reality as possible. no, controversial i think in the eyes of the people who actually were actors of that story backin actually were actors of that story back in the day. and when they know, when they see there is a movie coming up about that story, they think it's controversial for them, they make it controversial by saying, oh, its controversial subject. it's not, wejust have to get back to the truth. the subject. it's not, we just have to get back to the truth. the criticism ou've get back to the truth. the criticism you've taken _ get back to the truth. the criticism you've taken to — get back to the truth. the criticism you've taken to this _ get back to the truth. the criticism you've taken to this character, - get back to the truth. the criticism | you've taken to this character, that when you play, a man you say you talked to over a ten year period, is one of the other police commanders he was taken hostage of the time said you didn't speak to any of them, the film is based solely on his words. no, no... if you want to gather all the information possible... gather all the information possible. . ._ gather all the information possible. . . gather all the information ossible... ., ., possible... that's what we did for ten years. — possible... that's what we did for ten years. we _ possible... that's what we did for ten years, we went _ possible... that's what we did for ten years, we went to _ possible... that's what we did for ten years, we went to see - possible... that's what we did for - ten years, we went to see everybody, everybody wanted to talk to us. we went to see it on to him, philippe, the main character, to see also his colleagues, the people who like him and who dislike him, and they went to see everybody. we heard so many, and we had to cross information, to realise to know if it was true or not and to see if it was relevant. but really, ten years journalistic investigation, really. it’s investigation, really. it's interesting _ investigation, really. it's interesting you - investigation, really. it's interesting you say - investigation, really. it's interesting you say that, for the characters issued a joint statement backin characters issued a joint statement back in november 2011 just after the film was released, saying it's a fiction and not historical reconstruction of the facts. another one of those, one of those who signed it, the magistrate after he saw the film, to be fair, he did see the film but then he wrote i don't blame mathieu kassovitz. i blame him that he wants to get closer to the truth. ~ �* , ' :: that he wants to get closer to the truth.�* , '::y that he wants to get closer to the truth. , truth. we're putting 150 years plus ten da s truth. we're putting 150 years plus ten days of— truth. we're putting 150 years plus ten days of drama _ truth. we're putting 150 years plus ten days of drama in _ truth. we're putting 150 years plus ten days of drama in two _ truth. we're putting 150 years plus ten days of drama in two hours - ten days of drama in two hours format. we called him for years, he never answered. format. we called him for years, he neveranswered. he format. we called him for years, he never answered. he didn't want to talk about it. he was close to philippe, he called him, he didn't answer. so we are trying to get as close to reality but we're making a hour format movie and we have to constrain reality to our format, so it is a drummer, it is a movie, but it's... it's the balanced reality of the political truth. it's not, maybe we did, he said something that he didn't say in reality, and i can feel that for him it's not what he was, but for the history and how we can sum it up, and it's very close to what happened. the political evidence are close. i had a run—in with the general that we portrayed in the movie and also... the overseer, the minister. yeah, the minister, he is partly responsible for what happened. they came to me and said oh exactly the same, your movie is not telling the truth, it's fiction, on and on. can you be's fiction, on and on. can you he's more specific, they said we haven't seen the movie but we hear it's really bad. that's the kind of reaction i got from these people. i supposed to quote him directly from backin supposed to quote him directly from back in november 2011, he said "they" that is the minister and prime minister who were running neck and neck in 1988, the life of the member is at stake and not because they were neck and neck for the second round of presidential elections. what he's saying is your scepticism about politics and politicians have seeped into your telling of the story.— politicians have seeped into your telling of the story. yeah, maybe, but the problem _ telling of the story. yeah, maybe, but the problem is _ telling of the story. yeah, maybe, but the problem is that's - telling of the story. yeah, maybe, but the problem is that's the - telling of the story. yeah, maybe, but the problem is that's the wayl but the problem is that's the way politics works, and it's not like... if that was the only time that government would lie and do something for political reasons, yeah, you could go like are you sure? because that's the way it works, and that's the way it was. i don't know why it went like that, i don't know why it went like that, i don't know why it went like that, i don't know if it was a fight between these two guys but the result is there. when people come to me and says your movie is partisan, going towards the rebels, if you look at the... the police statement what happened, in the end 19 people get killed in a military assault where you never have 19 deaths when you have a military assault. you have five deaths, the rest of the people are wounded. everybody is dead. people get executed, and when you talk to the professionals, the negotiators, and they're saying we were negotiating and we found solutions —— they were negotiating. the audience can see, in britain it opens very soon. rebellion received one no nomination, the american equivalent of the awards. last year you told them it's unfortunate the french film in industry does not see this film is a hit. you also were quoted as saying why should i do a political movie in a country that does just want to have fun and not think of it. is that the explanation for the fact that it was a flop? {lilli for the fact that it was a flop? 0h ma be, for the fact that it was a flop? oi may be, because the for the fact that it was a flop? (31 may be, because the movie is not good enough, that can be the main reason but it's not about the quality of the movie but i'm not about, i want some of them, but i never want to get them. i'm not really keen to that organisation, i don't think it's very relevant and interesting and not very alive, not very lively. is interesting and not very alive, not very lively-— very lively. is it not a measure of auali ? very lively. is it not a measure of quality? ls _ very lively. is it not a measure of quality? is a _ very lively. is it not a measure of quality? is a measure _ very lively. is it not a measure of quality? is a measure of- very lively. is it not a measure of quality? is a measure of q - very lively. is it not a measure of quality? is a measure of 0 no, i quality? is a measure of 0 no, it's a show. quality? is a measure of 0 no, it's a shove so — quality? is a measure of 0 no, it's a show. so you've _ quality? is a measure of 0 no, it's a show. so you've got _ quality? is a measure of 0 no, it's a show. so you've got to - quality? is a measure of 0 no, it's a show. so you've got to be - quality? is a measure of 0 no, it's a show. so you've got to be part l quality? is a measure of 0 no, it's| a show. so you've got to be part of the show or you want to be of the show. i told them i'm not interested for years. so i'm not looking for it, i'm not vexed or anything, it's just that i think, especially in france, we are the creator of that art. we reinvented it many times and for many years, we were, you know, the creator, we were protecting movies through politics. we are very crucial. you guys in england took over. you have the most amazing social movie history. like ken loach to all these amazing directors. i want to ask you about the politics in a moment if i may, and the politics of yourfirst in a moment if i may, and the politics of your first film, let hang. butjust on this question with what happened in of rebellion in france, the truth is the audience did not grow and see it, it's not the french film industry... know, totall , i the french film industry... know, totally, i totally _ the french film industry... know, totally, i totally understand. - the french film industry... know, totally, itotally understand. i- totally, i totally understand. i don't know if i would've gone to see that movie because, you know, life is not really good right now and actually people want to, you know, you want to wind down, when you go to the movies you want to relax a little bit. this is not a very relaxing movie. and it makes you smell your own faeces, you know, it doesn't feel good. it's something that you need to be proactive about and i understand that people don't want that but what i'm shocked about is if the industry because that movie didn't do good, if the movie did good, who needs... nominations, but if the movie didn't do good, i think the french and film industry needs to recognise that cinema otherwise it will disappear. if they don't recognise it, doesn't mean they don't need it, i see no problem. but i cannot spend it ten years doing political movies in a country where i thought that roughly has a political citizen and an activist, that they don't care any more. this activist, that they don't care any more. �* , . . , activist, that they don't care any more, �* , . ., activist, that they don't care any more. a . ., .,~ , more. as much as a film maker, is much as an — more. as much as a film maker, is much as an actor, _ more. as much as a film maker, is much as an actor, that's _ more. as much as a film maker, is much as an actor, that's the - more. as much as a film maker, is much as an actor, that's the way i more. as much as a film maker, is l much as an actor, that's the way you see yourself?— see yourself? when i do political movies, see yourself? when i do political movies. yes- _ see yourself? when i do political movies, yes. when _ see yourself? when i do political movies, yes. when i _ see yourself? when i do political movies, yes. when i do - see yourself? when i do political movies, yes. when i do a - see yourself? when i do political movies, yes. when i do a movie| see yourself? when i do political- movies, yes. when i do a movie like that i'm an activist. so any recognition not for me as a director, not for me as an actor or as an artist, but for the political statement that we make. the film that established _ statement that we make. the film that established you, _ statement that we make. the film that established you, your- statement that we make. the film that established you, your first . that established you, your first feature film, hate. it was a film that had a tremendous impact when it was released in 1995. it has been called a masterpiece, a film for those who haven't seen it that portrays in black and white the circumstances leading up to and the consequences that follow from a riot in the paris suburbs, a place of high—rise buildings and low expectations. why do you think it has continued residence, that film? because we got touched by grace. the old crew, the project, sometimes you find subjects that you have to tell and the timing is right, it's the right moment, so you can't really control that. and today, still today i have every day people coming to me saying the movie changed their life. change your life, you said it stands for your life. my attitude toward all the things happening in the world, it's quite bleak.- all the things happening in the world, it's quite bleak. that's what i said world, it's quite bleak. that's what i said about _ world, it's quite bleak. that's what i said about the _ world, it's quite bleak. that's what i said about the movie? _ world, it's quite bleak. that's what i said about the movie? your - world, it's quite bleak. that's what i i said about the movie? your quoted as sa in: i said about the movie? your quoted as saying it- — i said about the movie? your quoted as saying it- it _ i said about the movie? your quoted as saying it. it was _ i said about the movie? your quoted as saying it. it was a _ i said about the movie? your quoted as saying it. it was a follow-up - as saying it. it was a follow-up about la hain. _ as saying it. it was a follow-up about la hain. it— as saying it. it was a follow-up about la hain. it was- as saying it. it was a follow-up about la hain. it was a - as saying it. it was a follow-up about la hain. it was a step i as saying it. it was a follow-up| about la hain. it was a step up. it's a part of me, what i am is a citizen and of course, if i can put it in my, you know, making movies, it's come located enough so, if you can make it, you know, important just for you as so you can, it fills you with... you know, you need to feel yourself and you need to find products that are meaningful. teh products that are meaningful. ten ears after products that are meaningful. ten years after hate, towns and cities around france as well, consequently we had the events in england a few years after that. for nearly three weeks you laid the blame at the door of the politicians, i think you were quoted from your website that can 2005 saying as much as i'd like to distance myself from politics, it's difficult to remain distant in the face of deprivations of politicians and when these deprivations draw the hate of all youth, i have to restrain myself from encouraging the writers. —— rioters. they want the kids to go crazy. because i did that because nicolas sarkozy, when he was the minister for the interior, that comment was about that, he went to a project at 10pm with 200 journalists and policemen. and the kids, they see that, it is an invasion and of course they started to just throw insults and things like that and he used that as, see what they are? 250 towns and cities over france, 900 cars torched. did they have just cause? cars torched. did they have 'ust cause? . . , cars torched. did they have 'ust cause? ., ., , ., ., cars torched. did they have 'ust cause? ., ., ., ., cause? that was after the death of two kids who _ cause? that was after the death of two kids who ran _ cause? that was after the death of two kids who ran from _ cause? that was after the death of two kids who ran from the - cause? that was after the death of two kids who ran from the police i cause? that was after the death of. two kids who ran from the police and kill themselves hiding. and the politicians were like, they should not have run.— politicians were like, they should not have run. does that 'ustify all ofthe not have run. does that 'ustify all of the trouble * not have run. does that 'ustify all of the trouble all h not have run. does that 'ustify all of the trouble all over _ not have run. does thatjustify all of the trouble all over france - not have run. does thatjustify all of the trouble all over france for| of the trouble all over france for three weeks? it of the trouble all over france for three weeks?— three weeks? if you disrespect --eole, three weeks? if you disrespect people. don't _ three weeks? if you disrespect people, don't expect _ three weeks? if you disrespect people, don't expect respect l three weeks? if you disrespect - people, don't expect respect back. they cannot... it is too much. when you are a kid in a project you need to be respected and if you are not, you will go nuts. the to be respected and if you are not, you will go nuts-— you will go nuts. the politicians did respond. — you will go nuts. the politicians did respond, jacques _ you will go nuts. the politicians did respond, jacques chirac- did respond, jacques chirac acknowledged the poison of ritual dissemination, saying it saps the foundation of the republic. was it reallyjustified? it is foundation of the republic. was it really justified?— reallyjustified? it is not my contempt. _ reallyjustified? it is not my contempt. it _ reallyjustified? it is not my contempt, it is _ reallyjustified? it is not my contempt, it is the - reallyjustified? it is not my contempt, it is the reaction| reallyjustified? it is not my i contempt, it is the reaction of reallyjustified? it is not my - contempt, it is the reaction of the kids. it is not like i say something, itjust happens, the kids reacted and they torched cars. they do not kill anybody. it is just a reaction against the establishment and against the way these people... it is all about respect. rebellion is the same story. if you do not respect, then you cannot find peace. is that a justification? i respect, then you cannot find peace. is that a justification?— is that a 'ustification? i think it is. you is that a justification? i think it is. you cannot, _ is that a justification? i think it is. you cannot, you _ is that a justification? i think it is. you cannot, you cannot - is that a justification? i think it is. you cannot, you cannot be | is that a justification? i think it i is. you cannot, you cannot be hit that much and not fight back. your film was shown _ that much and not fight back. your film was shown several _ that much and not fight back. your film was shown several times in the wake of the london riots, you mentioned in passing in 2011 riots in london and other cities in england and there was also looting. and you said following up that that this is may of last year, there is a political meaning, you don'tjust do that to get a flat screen tv, you break the windows of the shops that represent the windows of the society we live in but it turned out when lots of those cases went to court, a lots of those cases went to court, a lot of the kids from poor parts did not need a television and did not argue, they came from good, stable homes and some were quite wealthy. i saw that afterwards. does that not give lie to the position you have? things shift from 1995. they do not write any more. but the range is the same and yes, some kids arejust stupid, you know? you same and yes, some kids are 'ust stupid, you know? you mentioned nicolas sarkozy — stupid, you know? you mentioned nicolas sarkozy he _ stupid, you know? you mentioned nicolas sarkozy he went _ stupid, you know? you mentioned nicolas sarkozy he went on - stupid, you know? you mentioned nicolas sarkozy he went on to - stupid, you know? you mentioned - nicolas sarkozy he went on to become president and just before the election last year when francois hollande beat him, he said if sarkozy is back for another five years it is a tragedy but francois hollande would mean an open door to marine le pen in five years. i cannot see any positive outcome of the situation. when you're on, do you still feel that? i the situation. when you're on, do you still feel that?— you still feel that? i am sure she is auoin you still feel that? i am sure she is going to _ you still feel that? i am sure she is going to be — you still feel that? i am sure she is going to be next. _ you still feel that? i am sure she is going to be next. i— you still feel that? i am sure she is going to be next. i am - you still feel that? i am sure she is going to be next. i am sure. i is going to be next. i am sure. there is no... if you have somebody to put in front, we would already know his name, there is nobody. it might be nicolas sarkozy again. he: was a joke. he might be nicolas sarkozy again. he: was ajoke. he killed might be nicolas sarkozy again. he: was a joke. he killed us for five was a joke. he killed us forfive years, he killed the spirit and that is one reason why i want to leave france, he killed the spirit for five years and francois hollande is not helping. and we are not the same people as what we thought we were, still. we do not fight any more. what still. we do not fight any more. why do ou still. we do not fight any more. why do you want — still. we do not fight any more. why do you want to _ still. we do not fight any more. why do you want to leave? you can rail against the place you live in but you want to get out? i against the place you live in but you want to get out?— against the place you live in but you want to get out? i like to pay taxes but i _ you want to get out? i like to pay taxes but i want _ you want to get out? i like to pay taxes but i want to _ you want to get out? i like to pay taxes but i want to pay _ you want to get out? i like to pay taxes but i want to pay taxes - you want to get out? i like to pay taxes but i want to pay taxes for| you want to get out? i like to pay| taxes but i want to pay taxes for a reason and i want to see that in work. and i do not feel that energy any more. work. and i do not feel that energy an more. ., ., ., _ any more. you are not bothered by the 75 tax hike? _ any more. you are not bothered by the 75 tax hike? |_ any more. you are not bothered by the 75 tax hike? i would _ any more. you are not bothered by the 75 tax hike? i would be - any more. you are not bothered by the 75 tax hike? i would be very... | the 75 tax hike? i would be very... if the the 75 tax hike? i would be very... if they had — the 75 tax hike? i would be very... if they had that _ the 75 tax hike? i would be very... if they had that tax, _ the 75 tax hike? i would be very... if they had that tax, yes. - the 75 tax hike? i would be very... if they had that tax, yes. the - if they had that tax, yes. the problem with france right now as we are protecting socialism that we created, a very specific part of open socialism.— created, a very specific part of open socialism. you would pay the 7596? it open socialism. you would pay the 7596? it would _ open socialism. you would pay the 7596? it would be _ open socialism. you would pay the 7596? it would be another- open socialism. you would pay the 7596? it would be another reason i open socialism. you would pay the l 7596? it would be another reason for 75%? it would be another reason for you to go? i 7596? it would be another reason for ou to no? ., 7596? it would be another reason for ou to to? ~' ., 7596? it would be another reason for ou to to? ~ ., ., you to go? i think i would leave, es. you to go? i think i would leave, yes- what _ you to go? i think i would leave, yes- what is _ you to go? i think i would leave, yes. what is the _ you to go? i think i would leave, yes. what is the point? - you to go? i think i would leave, yes. what is the point? i - you to go? i think i would leave, yes. what is the point? i need i you to go? i think i would leave, i yes. what is the point? i need to... if ou yes. what is the point? i need to... if you believe _ yes. what is the point? i need to... if you believe in _ yes. what is the point? i need to... if you believe in these _ yes. what is the point? i need to... if you believe in these causes, - yes. what is the point? i need to... if you believe in these causes, they| if you believe in these causes, they cost money. i if you believe in these causes, they cost money-— cost money. i would pay everything if it was well _ cost money. i would pay everything if it was well balanced _ cost money. i would pay everything if it was well balanced and - cost money. i would pay everything if it was well balanced and if - cost money. i would pay everything if it was well balanced and if i - if it was well balanced and if i knew that my money was not taken by stupid politicians. itide knew that my money was not taken by stupid politicians.— stupid politicians. we could all say that. who hides _ stupid politicians. we could all say that. who hides money _ stupid politicians. we could all say that. who hides money overseas. | stupid politicians. we could all say| that. who hides money overseas. it is terrible- — that. who hides money overseas. it is terrible. the _ that. who hides money overseas. it is terrible. the secret _ that. who hides money overseas. it is terrible. the secret foreign - that. who hides money overseas. it is terrible. the secret foreign bank| is terrible. the secret foreign bank account and foreign ministers —— ministers with foreign assets, what is driving this climate of distrust? an opinion poll suggested a large percentage that all politicians were corrupt, including 33% who voted for marine le pen? it is corrupt, including 3396 who voted for marine le pen?— marine le pen? it is actions, it is the way that. _ marine le pen? it is actions, it is the way that, when _ marine le pen? it is actions, it is the way that, when you - marine le pen? it is actions, it is the way that, when you do - marine le pen? it is actions, it is the way that, when you do not i marine le pen? it is actions, it is. the way that, when you do not have ethics, do not expect the citizens to have ethics.— ethics, do not expect the citizens to have ethics. they are doing the riaht to have ethics. they are doing the right things? _ to have ethics. they are doing the right things? declaring _ to have ethics. they are doing the right things? declaring and - to have ethics. they are doing the | right things? declaring and setting out? flit right things? declaring and setting out? .., , right things? declaring and setting out? , , ., , out? of course, but that is the way it should be... — out? of course, but that is the way it should be... that _ out? of course, but that is the way it should be... that is _ out? of course, but that is the way it should be... that is how- out? of course, but that is the way it should be... that is how it - it should be... that is how it should always be, these guys should be transparent, we should know. they are responsible for us. it be transparent, we should know. they are responsible for us.— are responsible for us. it will never be _ are responsible for us. it will never be like _ are responsible for us. it will never be like that. _ are responsible for us. it will never be like that. do - are responsible for us. it will never be like that. do you i never be like that. do you sympathise with gerard deborah do? 0r sympathise with gerard deborah do? or is he being theatrical marching out and going to the embrace of... i do not like the fact... that were put in is not a clean guy but i understand why he is mad at france, it is notjust paying taxes, you want to be proud to be part of the country, i want a president that represents me right now, somebody that i can be behind.— that i can be behind. before the election you _ that i can be behind. before the election you were _ that i can be behind. before the election you were quoted i that i can be behind. before the election you were quoted as i that i can be behind. before the i election you were quoted as saying, right and left, they have no solution. voting is to show cowardice. what is the alternative? the opening credits of la haine is a song by bob marley. burning and looting. at some point i think that... you know... i cannot say that! �* ., . that... you know... icannot say that! �* ., . ., ., that! another french revolution? these people _ that! another french revolution? these people need _ that! another french revolution? these people need to _ that! another french revolution? these people need to be - that! another french revolution? these people need to be scared i that! another french revolution? these people need to be scared a little bit. if you want to keep them in line, they need to know that you can kick there as is. if they feel they cannot be touched, they will not stop doing what they do. that they cannot be touched, they will not stop doing what they do. at the time that rebellion _ not stop doing what they do. at the time that rebellion was _ not stop doing what they do. at the time that rebellion was released i not stop doing what they do. at the time that rebellion was released in france, it is up to the cinema to do with the media can no longer do because of a lack of resources, you said. could you put these events under your lens? the farewell french film from you? the scandals over the budget? the problems of french politics quite shallow it is so alive and we can witness it. it is an ongoing movie. i do not think... maybe in a few years but we know everything. everything is exposed. the movies are here to keep the memory. the movies are here to keep the memo . �* the movies are here to keep the memo . ~ ., the movies are here to keep the memo . �* ., w y the movies are here to keep the memo . ~ ., a , ., the movies are here to keep the memo . ~ ., ., memory. and how quickly are you livin: ? memory. and how quickly are you livinu? i memory. and how quickly are you living? i already _ memory. and how quickly are you living? i already left. _ memory. and how quickly are you living? i already left. you - memory. and how quickly are you living? i already left. you are i living? i already left. you are gone? i living? i already left. you are none? living? i already left. you are one? .,, living? i already left. you are one? �* , living? i already left. you are one? ~ , ., gone? i live in los angeles. i am workin: gone? i live in los angeles. i am working still— gone? i live in los angeles. i am working still as _ gone? i live in los angeles. i am working still as an _ gone? i live in los angeles. i am working still as an actor - gone? i live in los angeles. i am working still as an actor but i gone? i live in los angeles. i am working still as an actor but as i gone? i live in los angeles. i am working still as an actor but as a| working still as an actor but as a director... i talked a lot about french social issues and i think i did it full—circle. french social issues and i think i did it full-circle.— did it full-circle. thank you very much for being _ did it full-circle. thank you very much for being on _ did it full-circle. thank you very much for being on the _ did it full-circle. thank you very much for being on the show. i did it full-circle. thank you very i much for being on the show. thank you. hello. we're into our first significant spell of summer heat at the moment, but how long will it last? well, certainly the heat will be widespread to start the week — quite humid by day and by night, too. 0k, not completely dry, but as we go through the second half of the week, we'll notice all of us gradually turning fresher, temperatures closer to where we would normally expect this stage injune and a bit more of a mix in conditions out there as well. back to the here and now. well, for monday morning it's already quite humid across some southern and eastern areas, a little bit fresher — the north and west will see the best of the morning sunshine. more cloud into north and west scotland through the day. some low cloud around the coasts. and this here's the remnants of that old weather front. it caused a lot of cloud in the afternoon yesterday for parts of wales and the south—west especially. it's more across the midlands and drifting into parts of south and east yorkshire later. not going to have a massive impact on temperatures, widely in the mid 20s for many — scotland 26, northern ireland at 211—25 celsius, experiencing their hottest day of the week. now, as we go into monday night, we'll see thicker cloud bring a bit more in the way of patchy light rain and drizzle to scotland and the west of northern ireland. some low cloud drifting northwards into northern england, but notice where that cloud is in place. temperatures not dropping much lower than around 15—17 celsius. now, as we go into tuesday, we've got that weather front which brings rain at the end of the day in western scotland, pushes a bit further southwards, combines with the old weather front which is sitting here across northern england to produce a bit more cloud for scotland, northern ireland, northern england on tuesday — the chance of a few showers breaking out later in the day. scotland, northern ireland, still warm where early sunshine gets through, but nowhere near as warm as monday. the heat continues to build further south and east, up to around 28 celsius in the london area by this stage. now, as you go through tuesday night into wednesday, that first weather front starts to push away, but still remnants of it across the northern half of the country, producing one or two showers, more especially across scotland. but away from that, some sunny spells across england and wales and the heat could build even further — could get to 28, 29 celsius by the time we hit the middle part of the week. some showers and heavy downpours in northern ireland later, and that's ahead of this area of low pressure between us and iceland, which will drive a cold front eastwards, sweeping away the humid air gradually as we go through thursday and into friday and introducing fresher conditions. but temperatures back closer to normal as we head towards the weekend and a few more showers around as well. take care. welcome to newsday, reporting live from singapore. i'm steve lai. the headlines: six policemen among the dead as gunmen attack churches and a synagogue in the russian republic of dagestan. chaos at one of the uk's busiest airports after a power cut disrupts the journeys of up to 90,000 passengers. the saudi arabian government says more than 1,300 people died at the hajj — the first official death toll. a fourth conservative has denied any wrongdoing over bets allegedly placed on the date of the uk general election. and in football, scotland fought to the very end but have crashed out of euro 202a. welcome to bbc news — broadcasting to viewers in the uk and around the world. we begin in the russian republic of dagestan, where police say they've killed four gunmen who launched a series of attacks in the cities of derbent and makhachkala. on the orthodox festival of pentecost as well as a police vehicle in the village of sergokal.