responsibility, and it we can expect to hear a great deal more from her. i think she's also got to be quite tactical about this, because no doubt she has been positioning herself as a potential leader of the conservative party, and certainly as a leader of the right. she is not the only person in the conservative party that will run on that ticket should they lose the next election, and she will have a very strong competition from someone like kemi badenoch, for instance, who has been demonstrably more loyal whilst in government. i think suella has to pick herfights and government. i think suella has to pick her fights and be quite tactical about them. just in terms of democratic accountability, somebody in the house of commons needs to be talking about these issues, and quite frankly, reshuffles, because a great deal of excitement people in the westminster bubble, but they are pretty insignificant once you get outside s w one, as they should be, because people have real lives to be getting on with, and this is all something of a pantomime.— of a pantomime. joanne nadler s-ueakin of a pantomime. joanne nadler speaking to _ of a pantomime. joanne nadler speaking to me _ of a pantomime. joanne nadler speaking to me earlier. - of a pantomime. joanne nadler speaking to me earlier. let's i speaking to me earlier. let's go through some of the main changes in today's reshuffle. as we've been saying, the day began with the sacking of suella braverman, who left herjob as home secretary this morning after the prime minister sacked her. then we now have james cleverly replacing her at the home office. that opening up a vacant office the —— vacancy at the foreign office, which as we have been reporting all day, has been given to david cameron, the former british prime minister. steve barclay has left his job as health secretary, replacing therese coffey as environment secretary. victoria atkins is no help sell surety, taking up the role that steve barclay held. —— is now health secretary. laura trott replacesjohn glenn as chief secretary to the treasury, and richard holden is now taking over from greg treasury, and richard holden is now taking overfrom greg hands as chair of the conservatives. there is plenty on the live page, from which you may be watching this. the blockbuster news was the return of former prime minister david cameron to front line politics. our deputy political editor takes a look back at mr cameron's political career. as party leader, david cameron wanted to be seen as a modern, centrist, compassionate conservative, highlighting green issues, welcoming liberal democratic government and legalising gay marriage. all a far cry from the so—called culture wars of recent yea rs. good afternoon, everyone, and welcome. while out of office, the now lord cameron has been critical of some of rishi sunak�*s decisions, including scrapping part of the hs2 line. but there have been shifts in foreign policy, too. while he wooed the chinese president over a pint and a english pub, today, many tory mps see beijing as a huge threat. his intervention in libya in 2011 faced damning criticism. the foreign affairs select committee said it had been done with no proper intelligence analysis and the failures led to the country becoming a failed state. even more difficult will be questions about david cameron's career since leaving downing street. a committee of mps accused him of a significant lack ofjudgment over his lobbying of ministers on behalf of the finance group, greensill capital. it has been the biggest honour of my life to serve our country as prime minister. his legacy as prime minister is brexit, some voters will never forgive him for that, all the programme of austerity he oversaw. it's very rare for a former prime minister to to the cabinet. it means an experienced voice in the top team at a time of international turmoil, but it gives opposition parties and some tories plenty to complain about. of course, david cameron left parliament after their brexit referendum, which meant he was no longer an mp. to get back into political life, he has notjust been made foreign secretary, but also made foreign secretary, but also made a member of the house of lords, in some way, i supposed to give them some kind of accountability in the role. there have been some questions about the fact that when there are many mps serving in the house of commons, rishi sunak had to look outside to find a foreign secretary. let's have a listen to sir lindsay hoyle, the speaker of the house of commons, who is speaking earlier today. i commons, who is speaking earlier toda . ., ., commons, who is speaking earlier toda. ., ., ,. ,, today. i do not usually discuss uruent today. i do not usually discuss urgent questions, _ today. i do not usually discuss urgent questions, but - today. i do not usually discuss urgent questions, but today i l urgent questions, but today i received _ urgent questions, but today i received one, and rather than discuss — received one, and rather than discuss the matter in the chair, i thought— discuss the matter in the chair, i thought it — discuss the matter in the chair, i thought it would be better to set up my thoughts on the particular issue. the house _ my thoughts on the particular issue. the house will be aware that the prime _ the house will be aware that the prime minister has appointed the right _ prime minister has appointed the right honourable david cameron as secretary— right honourable david cameron as secretary of state for foreign development. this is not the first time _ development. this is not the first time a _ development. this is not the first time a cabinet minister has been appointed — time a cabinet minister has been appointed in the house of lords, but given— appointed in the house of lords, but given the _ appointed in the house of lords, but given the gravity of the current international situation, it is especially important that this house is able _ especially important that this house is abte to— especially important that this house is able to scrutinise the work of the foreign and commonwealth development office effectively. i've therefore _ development office effectively. i've therefore commissioned advice from therefore commissioned advice from the clerks _ therefore commissioned advice from the clerks about possible options for enhancing security of the work of the _ for enhancing security of the work of the foreign secretary when that post is— of the foreign secretary when that post is filled by a member of the other— post is filled by a member of the other house. i also look forward to hearing _ other house. i also look forward to hearing the — other house. i also look forward to hearing the government's proposals on how— hearing the government's proposals on how the — hearing the government's proposals on how the foreign secretary will be properly— on how the foreign secretary will be properly accountable to this house. i do not _ properly accountable to this house. i do not propose to respond to points— i do not propose to respond to points of— i do not propose to respond to points of order in the subject today until the _ points of order in the subject today until the advice i have referred to has been — until the advice i have referred to has been received, until i have heard — has been received, until i have heard the _ has been received, until i have heard the government's loan proposals. i can assure the house that i'm _ proposals. i can assure the house that i'm fully aware of the need for the honourable and right honourable members _ the honourable and right honourable members to be able to hold the government to account in this area, especially— government to account in this area, especially at the current time, and i shall— especially at the current time, and i shall do — especially at the current time, and i shall do everything i can to ensure — i shall do everything i can to ensure that we are able to do so. sir lindsay— ensure that we are able to do so. sir lindsay hoyle, the speaker of the house there. to discuss what he was saying forever, and joined still by our political correspondent. lindsay hoyle saying he is going to have a look at how david cameron, as foreign secretary, can be effectively scrutinised, given that he won't be in the house of commons, he won't be in the house of commons, he will be in the house of lords. what conversations are hearing about this in westminster today? that certainly has — this in westminster today? that certainly has been _ this in westminster today? that certainly has been a _ this in westminster today? trust certainly has been a concern. particularly opposition mps are wondering how they can hold the foreign secretary eight to account if he is not going to be one of them, but his father is a precedent for this, we know lord carrington was foreign secretary in the past, it isn't very common, and there are many opportunities for a foreign secretary to be questioned in house of commons, whether it be at foreign office questions, where the foreign secretary is questioned by mps, office questions, where the foreign secretary is questioned by mp5, or when they give statements in the house of commons and mps are able to question them. lindsay hoyle seems to be looking for some kind of solution so that he can still be held to account, particularly at a time when there are two major international conference going on, both in the middle east and ukraine. it is interesting, another opportunity to hold foreign secretaries to account has just been postponed, the foreign affairs committee, which is usually an opportunity for cross—party mps to question the foreign secretary or other representatives. tomorrow, they are meant to grill the foreign secretary and the permanent secretary at the foreign office. that has been postponed as a symptom of the confusion around this at the moment, and he will be picked up when and where. ads, moment, and he will be picked up when and where.— moment, and he will be picked up when and where. a boring procedural ruestion, when and where. a boring procedural question. but — when and where. a boring procedural question. but an _ when and where. a boring procedural question, but an important _ when and where. a boring procedural question, but an important one. - when and where. a boring procedural question, but an important one. the | question, but an important one. the foreign affairs committee want to question the foreign secretary. he could still appear, even though he has a large?— has a large? technically he could still appear _ has a large? technically he could still appear in — has a large? technically he could still appear in front _ has a large? technically he could still appear in front of _ has a large? technically he could still appear in front of things - has a large? technically he could still appear in front of things like | still appear in front of things like the foreign affairs committee, even if he was aboard. he would not be giving statements, for example, in the house of commons, ordering foreign office questions in the house of commons, when he answers mp's questions. it looks like tomorrow's committee has been postponed, presumably because of the change suppose that we have seen today. it was meant to be the case that james cleverly, today. it was meant to be the case thatjames cleverly, in his former role as foreign secretary, was meant to be grilled by the same piece tomorrow. he is home secretary, so that will be happening, but i think they will reschedule that for a later date once everyone has had time to settle into their newjobs. a crucial point of how unusual this is, it is normally a prime minister's questions that you will see the prime minister on the front bench and a lot will be about foreign operations, you have the israel — hamas conflict, there is war in ukraine, so that is a question, as well. would david cameron be called into prime minister's questions if there was discussion about foreign affairs? he wouldn't, would he? that discussion about foreign affairs? he wouldn't, would he?— wouldn't, would he? that is right. he is not an _ wouldn't, would he? that is right. he is not an mp _ wouldn't, would he? that is right. he is not an mp and _ wouldn't, would he? that is right. he is not an mp and moat - wouldn't, would he? that is right. he is not an mp and moat sit - wouldn't, would he? that is right. he is not an mp and moat sit in i wouldn't, would he? that is right. l he is not an mp and moat sit in the house of commons. he is able to be questioned by fellow peers in the house of lords, but he will be much less visible in that sense to members of the public, probably, in parliament, than most foreign secretaries would be. he still will be interviewed on the same way that foreign secretaries are. i'm sure he will be appearing in the media at some stage as well to answer questions in his new role, but he won't be seen on those frontbenchers as much, sitting next to the prime ministers and other great offices of state. that, some may argue, will mean he is able to focus on his ministerial role more than some mps may do, who hold ministerial breaks but alsojuggle their may do, who hold ministerial breaks but also juggle their constituency issues, particularly in run—up to the general election, where there is an expectation on ministers and mps to campaign heavily in their seats. that won't be selling david cameron will have to do as a lord, so that could be something that some of those in favour of his appointments will argue. those in favour of his appointments willargue. for those in favour of his appointments will ara ue. ., ., ., ,, will argue. for the moment, thank ou ve will argue. for the moment, thank you very much- — will argue. for the moment, thank you very much. do _ will argue. for the moment, thank you very much. do stay _ will argue. for the moment, thank you very much. do stay with - will argue. for the moment, thank you very much. do stay with us, i you very much. do stay with us, don't go away. we have lots to discuss, and i'm joined now by charlie rowley, who is a former special adviser to michael gove, the conservative mp who has held a number of prominent roles. thank you forjoining us here on the bbc. what do you make of today's events? there is a lot to get through. let's start with the return of david cameron. good afternoon. i thought it was a brilliant appointment, good afternoon. i thought it was a brilliantappointment, bringing good afternoon. i thought it was a brilliant appointment, bringing back david cameron, someone who will have to take very difficult decisions and did so when he was prime minister is, and he is someone who has had to communicate to the country, at a time when you are taking difficult decisions, because of the economy and everybody recognises those decisions that had to be taken, he was able to communicate that effectively and win a general election. getting in background the cabinet table to help with the government communications were generally, as well as being foreign secretary, is somebody who has dealt with foreign leaders as prime minister, is a brilliant appointment. i5 minister, is a brilliant appointment.- minister, is a brilliant appointment. minister, is a brilliant a- ointment. , , ., ., , appointment. is this an appointment that will unite _ appointment. is this an appointment that will unite or _ appointment. is this an appointment that will unite or divide _ appointment. is this an appointment that will unite or divide the - appointment. is this an appointment that will unite or divide the party? i that will unite or divide the party? comic i think will unite the party. i think people think very fondly of david cameron's premiership. i certainly do. it was a very one nation conservative vision for the country, articulating views during difficult economic times. there was something for difficult economic times. there was somethin: ., , , difficult economic times. there was somethina ., , , ., something for everybody under a david cameron _ something for everybody under a david cameron administration, i something for everybody under a | david cameron administration, so getting round the cabinet table to be part of the conversation and the wider government communications and making sure that people can understand some of the difficult decisions that have had to be taken under this government, and the decisions that will be taking going forward, he is a first class performer, a first—rate politician, and many more people in the conservative party are happier to see him there at than those who are not. ~ . , ., see him there at than those who are not. . ., i. ., ,, ., see him there at than those who are not. . ., y., ., ~' ., see him there at than those who are not. . ., i. ., ,, ., ., not. want you make of the fact that to return to — not. want you make of the fact that to return to front _ not. want you make of the fact that to return to front line _ not. want you make of the fact that to return to front line politics - not. want you make of the fact that to return to front line politics he - to return to front line politics he has been conferred as a lord? we have a commentator on earlier saying there will be a lot of members of parliament who will be disappointed that they have been overlooked for someone who has already had his turn, anyway? i’m someone who has already had his turn. anyway?— turn, anyway? i'm sure there will alwa s turn, anyway? i'm sure there will always be — turn, anyway? i'm sure there will always be peeple _ turn, anyway? i'm sure there will always be people who _ turn, anyway? i'm sure there will always be people who feel - turn, anyway? i'm sure there will always be people who feel they l turn, anyway? i'm sure there will. always be people who feel they have been overlooked when it comes to reshuffles, i am sorry to say, but i think you can't doubt david cameron's experience as a former prime minister. the communications ability that he has and the interactions he will have had with foreign governments during his time as prime minister makes him, as i say, more than qualified for this role, and at a time when the country is gearing up day by day, month by month, towards a general election, you need your best players on the pitch. i think he probably left earlier than the political scene then he might have wanted to, so it is good to have him back. and then he might have wanted to, so it is good to have him back.— is good to have him back. and he left because _ is good to have him back. and he left because he _ is good to have him back. and he left because he supported - is good to have him back. and he left because he supported the . is good to have him back. and he - left because he supported the remain campaign in the brexit referendum. now you have a cabinet full of many brexiteers. all that because any issues? i brexiteers. all that because any issues? ., �* ~' brexiteers. all that because any issues? ., �* ,, ~ ., issues? i don't think so. around the cabinet, issues? i don't think so. around the cabinet. you — issues? i don't think so. around the cabinet, you need _ issues? i don't think so. around the cabinet, you need a _ issues? i don't think so. around the cabinet, you need a wide _ issues? i don't think so. around the cabinet, you need a wide range - issues? i don't think so. around the cabinet, you need a wide range of l cabinet, you need a wide range of views. that was properly the reason liz truss did not last as long as she did, because it was too much of our charm and democracy, and she didn't get the balance of other colleagues. —— too much of a chumocracy. there are many good communicators during the brexit referendum, and the slightly lost out, but having a range of views around the cabinet table and having david cameron back around that cabinet table can only be a good thing. pare around that cabinet table can only be a good thing-— around that cabinet table can only be a good thing. are you sad to see suella girl? — be a good thing. are you sad to see suella girl? -- _ be a good thing. are you sad to see suella girl? -- sad _ be a good thing. are you sad to see suella girl? -- sad to _ be a good thing. are you sad to see suella girl? -- sad to see _ be a good thing. are you sad to see suella girl? -- sad to see her- be a good thing. are you sad to see suella girl? -- sad to see her go? l suella girl? —— sad to see her go? in terms of immigration and stopping the small boats, that is still one of the prime minister's priorities, and we'll get the rwanda verdict soon, and i think she articulated the views of wrong people. how she went about it as a former special adviser, i wouldn't advise anybody to use the language she did. she was clearly upstaging the prime minister at times, unhelpfully, and when general elections are usually one on the centre ground, if you start to have the rhetoric that is coming to often from the home office as it was under her, that will certainly put a lot of people off, especially when the conservative government has been in office for as long as it has, and when you start losing the voters you needin when you start losing the voters you need in order to win the next general election, he sought to run into problems. i think what suella was trying to articulate at the time had resonated for a lot of people in the country, but the way she went about it was wrong, and that is why she is no longer the home secretary. suella braverman had disagreements with rishi sunak which ultimately led to her downfall. how will she play it out on the backbenches? well, i hope that she is disappointed and will take a day or two to take stock of the situation, and i have no doubt that as a former home secretary she will be seen as an important figure when it comes to the debates around policing. as i say, we have the rwanda judgment on wednesday. i would suggest she holds of any communication until we get that verdict. i would hope that she will reflect on today and still continue to support the conservative party in the way that she can, the best way that she can, because as i say, it is a tough mountain to climb if the tories are going to win the next general election stop they can do it, there is a path there, there are so many unknown voters, but divided parties do not win voters, and if she is seen to be the one causing division, that will cause huge problems going forward. if she has any other ambitions in the conservative party, she will remain a loyal, faithful backbench mp. you were saying — a loyal, faithful backbench mp. you were saying that it is important to have your best players on the pitch. what you make of the rest of the reshuffle moves today? i what you make of the rest of the reshuffle moves today?— what you make of the rest of the reshuffle moves today? i think they are brilliant. _ reshuffle moves today? i think they are brilliant. bringing _ reshuffle moves today? i think they are brilliant. bringing laura - reshuffle moves today? i think they are brilliant. bringing laura trott i are brilliant. bringing laura trott into the treasury, she is a great... she is a new intake, and robert holden, he has been on this programme many times i'm sure is a brilliant and effective munich eight, and those two appointments on their own are excellent. a wider shake—up of the team. —— brilliant and effective communicator. it shows the breadth of talent in the conservative party. you have people with great experience like david cameron, and some young people. rishi sunak is building a team that will take the fight to the country when it comes to the general election. ., ., , ., election. charlie rowley, former s - ecial election. charlie rowley, former special adviser _ election. charlie rowley, former special adviser to _ election. charlie rowley, former special adviser to michael - election. charlie rowley, former special adviser to michael gove, j special adviser to michael gove, thank you for sharing your insights here on bbc news. well, of course, we have been getting reaction across the political spectrum to today's news, so let's have a listen into what ed davey, leader of the liberal democrats, had to say. it what ed davey, leader of the liberal democrats, had to say.— democrats, had to say. it doesn't sound like — democrats, had to say. it doesn't sound like change _ democrats, had to say. it doesn't sound like change that _ democrats, had to say. it doesn't sound like change that rishi - democrats, had to say. it doesn'tl sound like change that rishi sunak told us he was going to give us, it sounds like desperation. and frankly he really can't appoint someone to the house of lords that easily. there is a process to check someone passes the test, and david cameron has a crisis and scandal around him over the green so scandal, and questions have to be asked whether it is appropriate to put him in the house of lords at all. —— greensil scandal. he house of lords at all. -- greensil scandal. ., ., scandal. he oversaw that referendum vote, do scandal. he oversaw that referendum vote. do you — scandal. he oversaw that referendum vote, do you think— scandal. he oversaw that referendum vote, do you think it _ scandal. he oversaw that referendum vote, do you think it will _ scandal. he oversaw that referendum vote, do you think it will bring - scandal. he oversaw that referendum vote, do you think it will bring the - vote, do you think it will bring the party together? the vote, do you think it will bring the party together?— party together? the conservative pa has party together? the conservative party has been — party together? the conservative party has been divided _ party together? the conservative party has been divided for - party together? the conservative party has been divided for a - party together? the conservative i party has been divided for a number of years now, there will be divisions over the sacking of suella braverman, a right to do so, but i'm sure will annoy some people on the conservative right, and david cameron will also prove a divisive figure. rishi sunak is a government thatjust can't do the work. that is obvious for some time. the sooner a general election, the better. you mention suella _ general election, the better. you mention suella braverman. it was expected that she might be sacked after her comments last week and over the last couple of weeks. can you expand on that a little, and also the protest at the weekend and the protests going forward, and how they should be managed? suella izsraverman _ they should be managed? suella braverman was _ they should be managed? suella braverman was never _ they should be managed? suella braverman was never fit - they should be managed? suella braverman was never fit to - they should be managed? suella braverman was never fit to hold | they should be managed? suella i braverman was never fit to hold the office of home secretary to begin with. she had been forced out previously. rishi sunak had to put her back, part of his weakness, because he was managing this divided conservative party, and frankly, he should have sacked a long time ago. it is a sign of his total weakness prime minister. when you consider the weekend, we should be giving thanks to mark rowley and the metropolitan police. they managed a difficult situation with huge professionalism, and it wasn't made easier by suella braverman's remarks, which were offensive and inflammatory. eur remarks, which were offensive and inflammatory-— remarks, which were offensive and inflammatory. sur ed davey, leader ofthe inflammatory. sur ed davey, leader of the liberal _ inflammatory. sur ed davey, leader of the liberal democrats, _ inflammatory. sur ed davey, leader of the liberal democrats, sharing i of the liberal democrats, sharing his thoughts on today's reshuffle. well, we have now heard that david cameron has hit the ground running in his first day of the job at the foreign office. he met india's foreign office. he met india's foreign minister, who is very close to prime minister narendra modi, and the minister who was due to meet james cleverly today, of course, said it was our pleasure to meet lord cameron on his first day in office. he added that the two had held a detailed discussion on realising the full potential of our strategic partnership. i think one of the main focus is between india and uk relationship is whether a trade deal will be secured by the end of the year, a much feted trade deal in a post—brexit world, one that otherforeign deal in a post—brexit world, one that other foreign secretaries have visited india to try and get fat trade deal inked, and it was supposed to be completed by last diwali, one year ago. supposed to be completed by last diwali, one yearago. it supposed to be completed by last diwali, one year ago. it didn't happen, they were still having talks, and it be interesting to see if david cameron in the role can put that further down the road. new shows then that the new foreign secretary, david cameron, is already right into thejob, and secretary, david cameron, is already right into the job, and that he secretary, david cameron, is already right into thejob, and that he met india's foreign secretary in his new job. let's bring in our political correspondent again. hello. david cameron has met india's foreign minister, trade is going to be a big issue, which the foreign secretary kind of leads on sometimes in terms of trade deals. which partnerships do you think are going to be most significant for mr cameron to focus on in the months ahead? india is one of them. . , , on in the months ahead? india is one of them. ., , , of them. that is right. this may have been _ of them. that is right. this may have been quite _ of them. that is right. this may have been quite a _ of them. that is right. this may| have been quite a long-standing have been quite a long—standing prearranged meeting with what would have been the former foreign secretary, no david cameron meeting his indian counterpart, that relationship will be significant. the department for business and trade have been working on trying to secure a business directory to deal with india, which is been seen as a prize for rishi sunak�*s government, and the trade secretary, kemi badenoch, for quite some time. given conflicts at the moment, partnerships of the us as well, and also various different counterparts in the middle east and in the gulf region will be seen as especially important. james cleverly spent the last couple of weeks of his tenure as foreign secretary visiting areas in the gulf and middle east, and in his response to the israel— gaza conflict. be one of the areas david cameron is looking to build on in his new post going forward. certainly, a big job ahead both of that conflict and also the war in ukraine as well.— ukraine as well. they call it shuttle diplomacy, - ukraine as well. they call it shuttle diplomacy, and - ukraine as well. they call it shuttle diplomacy, and wel ukraine as well. they call it i shuttle diplomacy, and we will be seeing a lot of david cameron flying around the world. a lot of people we have spoken to who are proponents of this change in the foreign office say that there a real advantage, of course, because david cameron is an internationally known name. he knows many of the foreign leaders, and foreign secretaries, that he will be meeting. foreign secretaries, that he will be meetinu. . , foreign secretaries, that he will be meetinu. ., , ., , meeting. that is right. certainly those who _ meeting. that is right. certainly those who have _ meeting. that is right. certainly those who have praised - meeting. that is right. certainly those who have praised this i those who have praised this appointment today, including some conservative mps, one of the reasons they have given for that is his contact book, the fact he is known in the international stage and has contacts within foreign governments as well from his time as prime minister and as well from his time as prime ministerand in as well from his time as prime minister and in government previously. certainly, that is being sold as a benefit of this appointment. closer to home, sold as a benefit of this appointment. closerto home, i think, those who are praising his appointment as foreign secretary are looking to the next general election here, seem he may be some someone who can... was still a conservative, less on the party than someone who has been —— less on the right of the party than someone like suella braverman. that might be an indication of where rishi sunak thinks the conservative party must head towards to turnaround the opinion polls, which have been sticking in a negative opinion for the conservative party for quite some time. the conservative party for quite some time-— some time. the conservative party and a lona some time. the conservative party and a long lost— some time. the conservative party and a long lost brother— some time. the conservative party and a long lost brother who - some time. the conservative party and a long lost brother who has i some time. the conservative party i and a long lost brother who has come home. that is when way of putting it. do stay with us. one of the main triggers today was the departure of suella braverman, who was sacked by rishi sunak this morning just before 9am. she has been replaced by the former foreign secretary, james cleverly, who saw speaking outside the home office, i should say, earlier today, as he was about to take up his earlierjob —— about to take up his earlierjob —— about to take up hisjob. i spoke to our home editor. he was auoin to i spoke to our home editor. he was going to do — i spoke to our home editor. he was going to do it _ i spoke to our home editor. he was going to do it in _ i spoke to our home editor. he was going to do it in his _ i spoke to our home editor. he was going to do it in his own _ i spoke to our home editor. he was going to do it in his own style i i spoke to our home editor. he was going to do it in his own style and l going to do it in his own style and was not going to be influenced by the rhetoric of suella braverman, but she has a bulging entry and it will start as soon as he walks through the door. you will be briefed by mi5 on all the top—secret things that home secretary must know, but after that he is going to have to start to get straight down to business, because downing street want him to look at a possible review of the powers the police have to ban protests stop it won't surprise you to know their interest is in thinking about the pro—palestinian march that happened on armistice day and other weekends, we expect there will be more of those. downing street also wanting to find ways in which the police can act more quickly in dealing with people who are displaying anti—semitic or other hateful propaganda. these things are not easy. this isjust the propaganda. these things are not easy. this is just the first thing on his in tray. it will be difficult to change the law on stopping protest, because that is tied in with the human rights act, article 11 of the european convention, ii of the european convention, enshrined in uk law, and actually arresting people, police would say that as an operational matter. already, he has something serious to think about, and then on wednesday, at 10am, we get thejudgment think about, and then on wednesday, at 10am, we get the judgment from the supreme court on whether or not the supreme court on whether or not the government's flagship policy of sending asylum seekers to rwanda, they regard as the key to undermining the people smugglers and the boats crossing the channel, we will find out whether the supreme court believes that is a lawful policy. if the government lose that, james cleverly is going to be straight into a very serious crisis in his first few days as home secretary. even if the government wins it, it is going to take some quite clever manoeuvring to get a flight anytime soon out to kigali, the rwandan because we know that there are lawyers already lined up to take on individual cases, even if the policy is regarded as lawful. that is just the job yesterday in the first three days! he also is the asylum system in crisis, hotels filled with migrants costing millions of pounds every day, and thatis millions of pounds every day, and that is one small thing that might be a bit of a headache for him, that the existing home office plan for moving people out of hotels and into other accommodation includes taking 1700 male migrants and putting them in an raf base at wethersfield, in james cleverly�*s constituency in essex. he has been quite vocal in opposing that idea as the constituency mp. now he is going to have to try and make that happen. you mentioned the ruling on wednesday. if you get into a bit more detail for wednesday. if you get into a bit more detailfor our wednesday. if you get into a bit more detail for our viewers about this particular european court dispute that could split the cabinet, potentially, depending on the way this was at wednesday. if the way this was at wednesday. if the government were to lose, that would be the trigger for quite a number of mps, and suella braverman certainly would be one of them, calling for britain to leave the european convention on human rights. rishi sunak has been on the offence on this issue. some people say —— on the fence on this issue, some people say he would be prepared to consider such a move. it would be a huge step for the party to take. there are many people in the centre of the conservative party who would be extremely concerned about the party deciding to tear up this human rights handbook which is guided this country, and to which we were to some extent offers of since the second world war. hugely controversial move if the government to lose on wednesday, and it be interesting to see which way downing street goes. even if the government wins, there will be quite a lot of legal challenges on an individual