To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
Ruling From Parliamentarian Gives Democrats an Extra Shot at Reconciliation. At the onset of the Biden Presidency, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer sat for an
interview with NBC News in which he telegraphed a so-called “ace up his sleeve.” Well, I think we now know the identity of the Ace: The most important policy
news on the federal level to drop since the last
newsletter is the Parliamentarian’s ruling that the majority party in the Senate the Democrats, via Kamala Harris for those uninitiated may pass three reconciliation bills this year. Democrats were already celebrating the fact that they could pass two reconciliation bills this year, but this ruling from the parliamentarian gifts Democrats a much-needed windfall to pass their increasingly expensive agenda. Indeed, in an interview on NBC News, Senator Bernie Sanders, Chair of the Budget Committee, noted that the ruling is “important because i
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Ruling From Parliamentarian Gives Democrats an Extra
Shot at Reconciliation. At the onset of the Biden
Presidency, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer sat for an interview with NBC News in which he
telegraphed a so-called ace up his sleeve. Well, I
think we now know the identity of the Ace: The most important
policy news on the federal level to drop since the
last newsletter is the Parliamentarian s ruling
that the majority party in the Senate the Democrats, via Kamala
Harris for those uninitiated may pass three reconciliation bills this year.
Laguna Beach Local News
By Justine Amodeo | Special to the Laguna Beach Independent
Alleging that the City of Laguna Beach violated the California Environmental Quality Act, a citizen-enforced statute, when it amended its Historic Preservation Program last summer, The Laguna Beach Historic Preservation Coalition, Preserve Orange County and Village Laguna filed a public interest lawsuit In Orange County Superior Court on Jan. 11.
Claiming that the City Council’s actions “were both short-sighted and unlawful,” the suit claims the CEQA protects the historic “built” environment to the same extent as the state’s natural resources such as air, water, and forests and that “as a matter of law, CEQA projects that substantially impact historic resources will have significant environmental impacts.”