Live Breaking News & Updates on நீதிமன்றம் வழங்கப்பட்டது சுருக்கம் தீர்ப்பு

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
A recent case in the Northern District of California presents a reminder that hospital systems need to consider antitrust issues when negotiating multi-hospital contracts with health plans. Unfortunately, even when hospitals reach mutually satisfactory agreements with health plans, the contracts are still subject to attack by third parties that view the contracts as anticompetitive.
In
Sidbe v. Sutter Health, Sutter negotiated a series of systemwide contracts with major health plans (each of which was large and sophisticated and would presumably have significant bargaining power).  Although the health plans were presumably happy with the contracts that they negotiated, the legality of the contracts was challenged in a consumer class action in which the class representatives alleged that, by bargaining to have its hospitals included in the health plan networks, Sutter violated antitrust laws by depriving the ....

United States , Sutter Heath , Court Granted Summary Judgment , Court Denied Summary Judgment , Sutter Health , Northern District , Attempted Monopolization , Emergency Treatment , Active Labor Act , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , சுட்டேர் ஹீத் , நீதிமன்றம் வழங்கப்பட்டது சுருக்கம் தீர்ப்பு , நீதிமன்றம் மறுக்கப்பட்டது சுருக்கம் தீர்ப்பு , சுட்டேர் ஆரோக்கியம் , வடக்கு மாவட்டம் , அவசரம் சிகிச்சை , செயலில் தொழிலாளர் நாடகம் ,