Page 6 - நீதிபதிகள் ர்ஃப் நாரிமன் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from நீதிபதிகள் ர்ஃப் நாரிமன். Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In நீதிபதிகள் ர்ஃப் நாரிமன் Today - Breaking & Trending Today

Courts can't modify an arbitral award, says SC | India News


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said that a judge, while interpreting a law, should try to understand the intent of legislative bodies and quashed the Madras HC verdict which had held that the court’s powers to “set aside” an arbitral award under the arbitration law would also include the power to modify.
“Quite obviously if one were to include the power to modify an award in section 34 (Arbitration Act), one would be crossing the Lakshman Rekha. In interpreting a statutory provision, a judge must put himself in the shoes of the Parliament and then ask whether Parliament intended this result. Parliament very clearly intended that no power of modification of an award exists in section 34 of the Arbitration Act,” a bench of Justices R F Nariman and B R Gavai said. ....

Tamil Nadu , Tushar Mehta , Lakshman Rekha , Nagpur Improvement , Supreme Court , Arbitration Act , Justices Rf Nariman , General Tushar Mehta , International Trade Law , Model Law , International Commercial Arbitration , Nagpur Improvement Trust , தமிழ் நாடு , துஷார் மேத்தா , லக்ஷ்மன் ரேகா , நாக்பூர் முன்னேற்றம் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , நடுவர் நாடகம் , நீதிபதிகள் ர்ஃப் நாரிமன் , ஜநரல் துஷார் மேத்தா , சர்வதேச வர்த்தகம் சட்டம் , மாதிரி சட்டம் , சர்வதேச வணிகரீதியானது நடுவர் , நாக்பூர் முன்னேற்றம் நம்பிக்கை ,

Judges must put selves in shoes of Parliament: SC | India News


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said that a judge, while interpreting a law, should try to understand the intent of legislative bodies and quashed the Madras HC verdict which had held that the court’s powers to “set aside” an arbitral award under the arbitration law would also include the power to modify.
“Quite obviously if one were to include the power to modify an award in section 34 (Arbitration Act), one would be crossing the Lakshman Rekha. In interpreting a statutory provision, a judge must put himself in the shoes of the Parliament and then ask whether Parliament intended this result. Parliament very clearly intended that no power of modification of an award exists in section 34 of the Arbitration Act,” a bench of Justices R F Nariman and B R Gavai said. The bench said it is only for the Parliament to amend the provision in the light of the experience of courts in the working of the Arbitration Act, 1996, and bring it in line with other legislations the wor ....

Tamil Nadu , Tushar Mehta , Lakshman Rekha , Nagpur Improvement , Supreme Court , Arbitration Act , Justices Rf Nariman , General Tushar Mehta , International Trade Law , Model Law , International Commercial Arbitration , Nagpur Improvement Trust , தமிழ் நாடு , துஷார் மேத்தா , லக்ஷ்மன் ரேகா , நாக்பூர் முன்னேற்றம் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , நடுவர் நாடகம் , நீதிபதிகள் ர்ஃப் நாரிமன் , ஜநரல் துஷார் மேத்தா , சர்வதேச வர்த்தகம் சட்டம் , மாதிரி சட்டம் , சர்வதேச வணிகரீதியானது நடுவர் , நாக்பூர் முன்னேற்றம் நம்பிக்கை ,