/ED attaches properties of Muzaffarpur shelter home accused wife and NGO in Delhi worth Rs 1.45 cr
ED attaches properties of Muzaffarpur shelter home accused wife and NGO in Delhi worth Rs 1.45 cr
By IANS| Published: 4th March 2021 6:48 am IST
New Delhi, March 3 : The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Wednesday took possession of immovable property worth Rs 1.45 crore situated in the national capital in connection with a money laundering case in Muzaffarpur shelter home case.
The ED official said that the financial probe agency attached properties in the national capital associated with the NGO Sewa Sankalp Ewam Vikas Samiti and its sister NGOs.
Money laundering probe on against Brajesh Thakur
The Enforcement Directorate has taken possession of a multistorey building in Delhi in connection with the Muzaffarpur shelter home case in which several minor girls were allegedly sexually and physically abused.
The agency has taken possession of the building worth ₹1.45 crore located in Delhi’s Palam Colony and a fixed deposit amounting to ₹2.07 lakh in the name of Aadarsh Mahila Shilp Kala Kendra.
The money laundering probe is based on two FIRs registered by the Mahila police station in Bihar’s Muzaffarpur and one case lodged with the CBI, against Brajesh Thakur and others.
Muzaffarpur shelter home case: Convict approaches HC bignewsnetwork.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from bignewsnetwork.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Muzaffarpur shelter home case: One more convict approaches Delhi High Court ANI | Updated: Dec 28, 2020 20:19 IST
New Delhi [India], December 28 (ANI): An appeal has been filed in Delhi High Court by one of the convicts challenging his conviction and sentencing by a trial court in connection with the Muzaffarpur shelter home case.
The petition stated, The trial court has failed to appreciate the law and facts on record. The trial court has committed a grave error in law as well as on facts, as the conviction against the appellant is based on the assumption, presumptions and further on the surmises and conjectures and as such the impugned judgment and order on sentence is liable to be set aside.