ADVERTISEMENT
Impeachment Witness Wants $1.8M Suit In Claims Court
Law360 (July 26, 2021, 7:26 PM EDT) Former President Donald Trump s EU ambassador, who is suing ex-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the Biden administration for $1.8 million in legal fees incurred during the 2019 House impeachment probe, told a D.C. federal court that the prosecution s recent admission warrants transferring the case to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.
Gordon Sondland, who delivered bombshell testimony during the impeachment investigation, said in a motion Friday that the Federal Claims Court, which hears monetary claims against the U.S. government, is the correct venue. The U.S. Department of Justice confirmed in a July 13 notice that Pompeo is immune from the.
Should You Consider Investing in Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA)?
insidermonkey.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from insidermonkey.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Biden Amps Diversity at Michigan Bench, Court of Federal Claims
courthousenews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from courthousenews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Wednesday, May 12, 2021
In
Navajo Nation v. U.S. Department of the Interior, 2021 WL 1655885 (9th Cir. 2021), the Navajo Nation sued the Department of the Interior (Interior), the Secretary of the Interior (the Secretary), the Bureau of Reclamation, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs (collectively, the Federal Appellees) for breach of trust based on the government’s failure to consider the Nation’s as-yet-undetermined water rights under the
Winters doctrine in managing the Colorado River. Several parties, including Arizona, Nevada, and various state water, irrigation, and agricultural districts and authorities (Intervenors), intervened to protect their interests in the Colorado’s waters. The district court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the Supreme Court had reserved jurisdiction over allocation of rights to the Colorado River in its 1963 decision in