comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - கண்டம் மேற்கு காப்பீடு இணை - Page 1 : comparemela.com

The Biggest Insurance Rulings From The 1st Half Of 2021

The Biggest Insurance Rulings From The 1st Half Of 2021
law360.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from law360.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Indiana Supreme Court Rules Not All Ransomware Hacks Covered

Tuesday, May 25, 2021 The Indiana Supreme Court recently reversed a trial court’s finding and an affirming intermediate appellate court opinion regarding the interpretation of a policy providing coverage for cyber-crime. In  G&G Oil Co. of Indiana, Inc. v. Continental Western Insurance Co., the state high court rejected the lower courts’ narrow interpretation of coverage and impractical view on causation. A copy of the decision can be found here. Over three years ago, G&G Oil was locked out of its computer systems by a hacker following a social engineering fraud that was allegedly initiated by a targeted spear-phishing email. After consulting with the FBI and other tech services, G&G Oil paid a Bitcoin ransom to regain access to its computer systems and operations.

Privacy & Cybersecurity Update - April 2021 | Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Second Circuit Allows Data Breach Claims for Increased Risk of Identity Theft The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled that plaintiffs can establish standing to pursue claims arising out data breaches based solely on an increased risk of identity theft, provided that the plaintiffs can demonstrate that the risk is sufficiently concrete. On April 26, 2021, in McMorris v. Carlos Lopez and Associates, 1 the Second Circuit ruled that affected data subjects who have alleged only an increased risk of identity theft following a data breach can have standing to bring a claim. The ruling is somewhat of a departure from other circuits’ decisions on similar issues, in which data subjects without a concrete injury had been denied standing to sue. However, although the court ruled that it was possible to have standing based solely on increased risk, it denied standing in the specific case before it based on its determination that the plaintiffs had not shown sufficient in

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.