Latest Breaking News On - உண்மையானது ஆடை - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Wednesday, March 17, 2021 Addressing a range of trademark licensing issues, including discretionary approval, exculpatory contract clauses and third party beneficiary standing, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court’s grant of summary judgment to the US Army, finding that the Army abided by the terms of a trademark licensing agreement with a brand management company that sold clothing bearing the Army logo.  Authentic Apparel Grp., LLC v. United States, Case No. 20-1412 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 4, 2021) (Lourie, J.) In a 2010 licensing agreement, the Army granted Authentic Apparel, a brand management company that licenses merchandise, a non-exclusive license to manufacture and sell clothing bearing the Army’s trademarks in exchange for royalties. The licensing agreement gave the Army sole and absolute discretion on whether to approve any products and marketing materials bearing the Army’s trademarks. The licensing agreement also included exc

United statesAaron reubenAuthentic apparel grpUs armyUs courtFederal circuitAuthentic apparelFederal claimsIntellectual propertyLlcv united statesArmy trademark licensing agreementArmy authentic apparel licensing agreementஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்ரோன் ரூபன்உண்மையானது ஆடை க்ர்ப்எங்களுக்கு இராணுவம்