that was corrected no witness testified there was any review or investigation of any sort related to the ukraine and aid. is it true that the defense department determined not to conduct a review on ukraine after the president froze the military aid because ukraine had already met all of the corruption benchmarks in may of 2019? yes, and everyone involved in ukraine policy believed that they were on the right path and president zelensky in particular. in addition to ukraine having satisfied all the relevant corruption assessment prior to u.s. military aid being withheld, there is significant testimony that both the state department and the ukrainian embassy actually advised that a white house meeting with president zelensky would help further anticorruption agenda, correct? both the anticorruption agenda and the aggression, fighting the aggression from russia. in fact, president trump s budget fights down the cuts