polarizing us institution. great. frankly, it s not really surprising. last year, for example, trusttea the media hit an all time low and it just can t rebound. it seems low this last week wass clarified why with why it s a lie, especially whend. comes o the supreme court. you want to give an example? here we go . new york times call holsey writes this about that big political roe v. wade ruling. senate republicans did not havep to take the politically risky step of banning abortions. the courts took care of that for them. really,rt you would think someoe who s been reporting for more than 30 years couldrm. easy have got this right. but he didn t with the supreme courtut actually did, as you knw ,was kicked the decision back to the states. they did not ban abortion atrd all yesterday after the court rejected a case from health care workers challenging new york s vaccine mandate. who else went after but clarence thomas is found, as a fact checking now. do you mind fact check
34 felony counts. this is the first time an e fi american presidentrs has everprs been convicted of a crime. but the only thing trump is guiltyid convicte th of is beatg hillary and leading joe biden. the former president was expressionless as the verdict was read. sionless, he walked to the cameras and reacted. this was a disgrace. this was a rigged trial by a conflicted judge who is corrupt. there s a rigged trial, a disgrace. on an. ery innocent ma and it s okay. i m fighting for our country. i m fighting for our constitution. our country is being rigged right down. we ll keep fighting. we ll fight till the end. wee ouell win becaus our country s gone to . we don t have the same country anymorwe don te. we have a divided mess. we re a nation in decline, a serious decline. millions and millions of people pouring into our country of peop right now from prisons and from mental institutions, terrorists. and they re taking over our countrinstit y. s in we have a country tha
abortion and try to divide people. and i think this is this isn t about being pro-life or pro-choice. s she s going to the extent i that this is pro abortion. sshe s trying to go on the national scene to be the chief promoter of it as if it s a great thing that more and more people should consider writing. congressman, i want to hear i do want to hear this suggestion that you just made today about where w abortions could be taking place. tell mehed ifg you can get behind this , mr. president, we d ask that youid consider your ability toen use federal facilities. when i talk about veterans hospitals, military basesy and other places where the federal government whe contn the jurisdiction in some of the states that are hostile towo women s rights and make sureme that those services can be available to other women military bases are a good move . no, absolutely not.o, and it s a really it s sad
objectivity. a tremendous authority and very fortunate to have her. sandra: critics are saying the defense misses the entire point, this is not about monitoring people, it s about deciding what is the truth. bill: uh-huh. might seem clear-cut but it s not always the case, remember hunter biden s laptop? sandra: and questioning who decides what qualifies is the truth. it s how youid qualified. we ll see if jonathan turley agrees with that. sandra: fox team con board i defending hlf and her work in a facebook post. nina jankowicz maintains she
both afford to go to the same public schools. tucker: sounds like a great plan. the best part of the plan of course is that beto himself has no intention of participating in it. no one is going to put section 8 housing or homeless shelter next to beto s house.t there s no way his kids are going to high school with a bunch of poor people. k literally no chance of that happening. the real point of beto s plan isn t to bring rich people like himself back to earth, the poinl is to deny normal people the right to control their own lives. if youid would like to forest middle america be charitable. here s the interesting thing though. amazingly beto has exempted himself from that requirement. we know this for a fact because we have his financial disclosures. beto and his wife gave a total of just 0.3% of their income to charity in 2017. that s not just low by national standards, it s worse than that.