about half firearms. about half of all u.s. households have at least lea one gun at home, and many have. much more than that. plus, they have ammo, billions and billions of rounds of it. those are all real numbers, butg they are hardly an argument forn gun control. they re an argument, in fact, against ask yourself what would it require to confiscate allmmuo those guns and all that ammunition in turn, the united states into disarmed nation like turkmenistan or north korea? wellrea., it would take a police state and it would end in civil war. nono sam sane person wants eithr one of those things. but thankfully, we don t neehinn the fact that so manyirearm americans have a firearm withi n reach but never commit violence that gtbe that guns are no the problem. just as we can this country can be trusted with an ar-15, just as we can be trusted with cars and light aircraft t in andand electricity, basebaw and insecticide and chainsaws and pruning shearsct and countless other objec
office, am ily right? sexist would say. that s terrible. very bad but all fairness a woman did write that joke. which is proof if you wante. something done you have to ask woman. [laughter] and she wrote it probably while watching one of her stupid soap operas. wow. get another sexist would say. i ll stop niki but that just pumped it upsa amazon a few. all right so if you ve seen any. good movies lately and i don tv- mean one that went viral ofs kilmeade and that alpaca but if you said no that is your fault you re racist sexist or even a homophobe.xist that s how actor billy angerly explains his pathetic box office debut of gay comedy bros i getme more view wheres i leave the bathroom door open [laughter] although it made gay cinema b history with broke back mountain at the broke amount the box off so sparsely attend nod one gotno monkeypox.ke a homophobe would say. terrible joke [laughter]omop apparently made 4 million over the weekend, that s what larryor kud
Joly, j. D. Pavlik and greg g gutfeld. Itsits 5 00 in New York City at six. You want happy greg . E yo u has the fi. Death squads hamas caucuss ca is demandinguc more chaos whilet denying the threat to jewish students t that Jewish Studentsm face from antisemitic mobs. The nypd up two more antiisrael Protests Clearing Encampments at nyu and the new school. It was a less confrontational scene compared to madness at uclmpared ta and columbia, we protesters obeying orders, and the police to disperse and get out of their tents. But leave it to the squad to give cover to the mob. The radical progressive lawmakers are downplaying antiislamssiv autism. Is my message is the same to a jewish student, to a palestiniastudent,n student. To everybody that it is really to educate yourself about what is antisemitic, about what . Islamophobic. I visited the columbia encampment las ibit and they c completely peaceful. I also metef with socalled pro israel students when i there just to hear about the an
The problem is always the person, not the tool he uses to commit a crime. crime. if you wante if you wanted to stop murder,fon you would focus on the people who are committing murder, not on the hundreds of millions ofo their neighbors who are nonot. you d really want to know whata motivated killers to kill. and the firsint thing you wouldn do is study what murderers havee in common with one another, thw theyr. were raised and where their educational backgrounds, their genetic make up drug alcohol us and alcohol use, their ideological and religiouhs views, their behavior, behavio, and probably a whole lot of other factor s. would doould study murderers and you would do it with an open mind as a scientist, wouldt you would be serious about it in tuse it matters. in the late nineteenth century, researchers finally decided that infection is spread by germs. esul and as a result oft of that conclusion, surgeons are now required to wash their hands before they cut you open. everybodyu a
Rubio being pescado, i think loo makes them look childish. i call bs on this book. they were this far from reality on game change. if you listen to sarah palin, they were terrible. they weren t accurate. it was entertaining, but not accurate. i m going to say there isac nothing here. why are we listening to them?man i think they re just trying to sell a few books, get on morning joe and pat themselves on thee back. what is morning joe? something in the morning? is it about coffee? yeah. here is the thing, if you wante, to figure out who leaks thee information for a book, this is such an easy thing. find out in the leaks who is described well. dan pheiffer is described as whip smart in the book. sma gee, i wonder why? because he provided all the