like in frozen silence just kind of like hoping nobody heard this. maybe this will go away. if i don t say anything, maybe it will go away. and then finally people coming out and saying, this is a bridge too far, even for a president who is, you know, on mars now going bridge after bridge. i think it s important that the republicans that are beginning to speak out, continuing to speak out, i am very concerned actually because this is as close to a i don t know, treasonous thing as you can say. if you re president of the united states sitting in the oval office and say i would take dirt, information from a foreign source to go after my opponent, that begins to sound like an invitation. i can t imagine if you re sitting around in china or russia. that s a yawner. so i think it s a big deal. i think people know it s a big deal. i think the republicans have to admit it s a big deal and hope he walks it back. at the end of the day, you ll have more people coming out and saying this is a b
how do you even do it? sometimes it is familiar. it is familiar from the last time a republican was in the white house. for example, john bolton is back. remember him from the george w. bush era? elaine chow. she was labor secretary under george w. bush. now she s transportation secretary under donald trump. george w. bush s deputy chief of staff was joe hagan. donald trump hired the same joe hagan for the exact same job last year. so on the planet, where the trump administration is just the next republican administration after george w. bush, it was a bit of a yawner when trump announced that his latest nominee to the supreme court would be, surprise, a bush guy. and probably the most bush guy he could have found. dating back to the year 2000 when the bush campaign dispatched this guy to work on the florida election recount. the following year brett kavanaugh land ad primo position working in the george w. bush
sometimes it is familiar. it is familiar from the last time a republican was in the white house. for example, john bolton is back. remember him from the george w. bush era? elaine chow. she was labor secretary under george w. bush. now she s transportation secretary under donald trump. george w. bush s deputy chief of staff was joe hagan. donald trump hired the same joe hagan for the exact same job last year. so on the planet, where the trump administration is just the next republican administration after george w. bush, it was a bit of a yawner when trump announced that his latest nominee to the supreme court would be, surprise, a bush guy. and probably the most bush guy he could have found. dating back to the year 2000 when the bush campaign dispatched this guy to work on the florida election recount. the following year brett kavanaugh land ad primo position working in the george w. bush office. he was later promoted to white house staff secretary. that is a crucial but influential p
sometimes it is familiar. it is familiar from the last time a republican was in the white house. for example, john bolton is back. remember him from the george w. bush era? elaine chow. she was labor secretary under george w. bush. now she s transportation secretary under donald trump. george w. bush s deputy chief of staff was joe hagan. donald trump hired the same joe hagan for the exact same job last year. so, on the planet where the trump administration is just the next republican administration after george w. bush, it was a bit of a yawner when trump announced that his latest nominee to the supreme court would be, surprise, a bush guy. and probably the most bush guy he could have found. dating back to the year 2000 when the bush campaign dispatched this guy to work on the florida election recount. the following year brett kavanaugh landed a primo position working in the george
pieces of payment that manafort has either touch or signed to prove its case and they ll jazz it up a little bit. they ll have rick gates and others to narrate the case which the jury will undoubtedly find a little more interesting than looking at paper. still, you have to wonder why he was holding out. why he wasn t pleading guilty. i thought we might see a bit of a twist. what his defense would be during opening statements. instead we got the my underling defense did it. it s a bit of a yawner. something juror there s occasionally show interest in. it doesn t seem like a strong defense. i was surprise that had we didn t see a better opener. are you able to answer the question, why is manafort holding out? there are a couple of