should be. i mean, i ve always liked katie couric s shows, i think she s a bubbly personality and fun fashion, but i m not looking for her to interpret the english language for me. and to protect people who she admires when she said she was protecting ruth bader ginsburg. you know this emily more than anyone. rbg had an independent streak to her, she criticized roe v. wade despite being pro choice, and here was her streak again. does she really need protecting from katie couric? i think this is absolute y nayser narcissistic of katie couric. in her book she writes about how it s male-dominated industry how she supported and defended quote women whenever she could when she wasn t tearing them down as she said in other chapters. here he she is infantilizing a sitting supreme court justice thinking it takes katie couric to edit ruth bader ginsburg? absolutely not. and it was she who made the determination or the approval of the determination based on a