language. it probably only takes me somewhere between 45 and 9 0g seconds to actually write the review. because number one, i can keep all the notes in my head. i never write anything down. i m always thinking about all of these different details, all the specifications, and then i simply just organize on the screen what was already in my head. i think that makes me different than other reviewers. they ve r experimented with different ways of awarding people for writing reviews. y we want people to like us, think we re good looking. we want people to think we re funny. and tech platforms have notten savvy of providing us with these little hits of dona mean that.
giving you the albums. you don t get a chance to hate on it. people are writing reviews before the music comes out or the music might come out and the hour later they have a review of this is classic or trash. i go to therapy a lot now. my therapist says you have to stop having expectations for other people. i get so let down in other people some time or other people s opinions. why do i have expectations about other people opinion. i need to let it go and let people think how they want to think. we is agree to disagree. i shouldn t have expectation about somebody s opinions or thoughts. is there an insight you ve gotten about yourself or the world out of therapy? absolutely. the biggest insight is it s okay to not know. it s okay to constantly be trying to figure things out. i m the go to guy for a lot of people. who does the go to guy or go to woman go to when they need to speak to somebody?
writing reviews, but what about the spoileder problem. don t you get annoyed if you read something online if you re trying to avoid it? like learning the score of a basketball game that you ve taped to watch later. much like a good sporting event, you can watch it over and over. the quality is high enough, spoilers won t make a difference. i can think like i knew what was going to happen in game of thrones, too. it was still compelling viewing. and with arrested, there is so much richness to the text, so much inside jokes that you can watch it again and again. ken tucker, it seems to me that it raises the question of which is the audience that you are writing for. it was so easy in the old days because everybody was on episode three and it would be the hype and anticipation and speculation about episode four. now you don t know whether you re writing for somebody who has seen the entire season or only a couple of episodes and that has to be challenging for
his love the fame came as an early age. i started going to the movies at a child as everybody did. my aunt would take me to the grown-up movies. my dad would take me to see the marx brothers. he began writing reviews for the chicago sun-times in the late 60s, and in 1975 was the first film critic to win the prize for criticism. he coauthored beyond the valley of dogs with russ meyer. in 1976, he teamed up with gene siskel to host a weekly review program on tv. within a few years it was put into syndication, and siskel and ebert s thumbs up, items down system became their trademark. two thumbs up had never applied to anything in history before. the phrase two thumbs up was not in use.