Wouldnt Permit News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Wouldnt permit. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Wouldnt Permit Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Intent. i read the charge which she had in front of her, intent to commit an act which causes death. we were talking about the jury instructions. i was shouted down roundly saying chris these instructions are always like this. i said that to you. i wasn t going to throw you under the bus because you re stronger than me. we may not have heard it yet it s what i don t hear her discuss. i believe this part of the analysis may have been poot in that room, no matter whether they thought he was guilty of murder or man slaughter it came down to whether it was justifiable and i didn t hear her ask or answer about how she felt about self-defense because why? because if she felt that, yes, he was guilty of manslaughter but he had to do what he did, he had to do that intentional act. that s not manslaughter. that s the law. but it s interesting, paul and chris, she did say when asked about the screams which i think was the bedrock of the defense case arguing that george ....
As well and she spoke eloquently about wanting to serve on the jury and so i watched her closely, and i thought that she got it. she seemed to understand rachel jae jeantle s testimony and during the prosecution s rebuttal argument i saw her nodding in agreement that tells me as a former prosecutor she s with the state on this. was it a mistake the verdict or was it the only choice under the law. i don t think it was a mistake. we ll see a lot of this, this is remorse sometimes jurors feel later on when they go back to their communities and people are saying how could you have come back with guilty in this case and they try to rethink the decision and come to this conclusion but she focuses on the interview the law wouldn t permit her to vote guilty because there was no intent to commit murder. well the charge in man slaughter is an intent to commit an act, ....
Pamela brown has been tracking these latest developments. good morning, kate, the second juror to come forward is not only speaking out, she s also showing her face in an interview with abc news juror b-29 says being a member of the jury that acquitted george zimmerman of murder in the death of interest of interest weighs on her so much she has trouble sleeping and eating and she says she owes trayvon s parents an apology. george zimmerman got away from murder but you can t get away from god. reporter: anguish and apologetic. the juror told robin roberts she favored of convicting george zimmerman of second-degree murder. i m the only minority and i felt like i let a lot of people down. reporter: maddy says it was the all-female jury s interpretation of the law that ultimately led them to acquitting zimmerman. for myself he s guilty but as the law was read to me, if it you have no proof that he killed him intentionally, you can t ....
Not murder, an act that causes death. so if they just read the instructions, clearly you could have voted yes, guilty, if you found the evidence was there. right. i think in the end she didn t find the evidence was there to support the law. i completely disagree. when you look at the jury instructions the jury instructions clearly said, chris, the state does not not have to prove that george zimmerman intended to kill trayvon martin. the in the interview she said in order to find him guilty of manslaughter we had to find when he left his home he intended to kill trayvon martin. that is a fundamental misunderstanding of manslaughter. we should give her a little leeway, she may be confused about which law she s talking about. this is confusing stuff. i don t know. she said what she said. i don t think we can say she was confused. but that would have been the right analysis for the murder charge. for the murder charge but not for manslaughter. they didn t have to prove ....
Forth and it s hard if you re a single juror talking with five other human beings who say your position doesn t make any sense. the movie 12 angry men the one guy converts everyone else. it s hard for jurors to move the majority. i agree but what i m hearing more and more is a fundamental misunderstanding of the jury instructions and you and i, chris, talked about it. as i read te as a lawyer with my legal hat on they re standard jury instructions, perhaps clear to me because i read them so many times in practice. when i listen to the jurors i think the lawyers failed these jurors, perhaps the judge failed these jurors because they didn t have a clear understanding of the law and applying the facts to the law. do you think it would have made a difference if the instruction was different even if they still had to get to those final moments and whether or not they thought that george zimmerman was reasonably in fear of serious injury. i keep coming back to that ....