it s also a strategic appeal. just for perspective here, we remember doj seized 11,000 documents out of mar-a-lago. they don t like the special master ruling as to any of it. they lost on all 11,000 documents. what they re doing is saying okay, let s carve out the most important to us doj 100 of those documents. they ve given up on there being a special master for the other 10,900 other documents but with respect to those classified documents, those should not go to the special master, we should be able to use them in the criminal investigation and national security investigation, by doing that they limited the upside and won t get the special master kicked out all together but limited their downside because if you take an appeal and lose on the whole thing in the 11th circuit, that s really bad for doj and sets a worse precedent for doj so i think they re trying to be tactical and strategic in what they re choosing to go after here. this whole process is getting dragged ou
investigation. by doing that they ve limited the up side. they re not going to get the special master kicked out altogether, but they ve limited their down side because if you take an appeal and lose on the whole thing in the 11th circuit that s really bad for doj. that sets an even worse precedent for doj. so i think they re being tactical and strategic. this whole process is being dragged out. is trump getting what he wants especially if this works its way all the way up to the supreme court? to be sure, don. we have seen donald trump use delay as a tactic plenty of times before often successfully. here we are six weeks after that search was done at mar-a-lago and the special master hasn t gotten started yet and now he has until november 30th to get this done, and we ve got a pending at least a request for stay going up to the court of appeals. yes, it s moving slowly, and yes, delay is to donald trump s benefit. phil mudd, does it make any sense to you this judge can
years, know a lot of people there, how they wouldn t have run this by someone who speaks spanish, who is hispanic, latino, latinax, and said would you just double-check this for us. because what s happened something that s good, something trying to reach a population that is growing, and that, don, is going to be a bedrock of your fan base for the next 50, 60 years onward as we become a majority minority nation, and those people are probably going to love their nfl football as much as their moms and dads and grandmothers and grandfathers did, that s your group. that s a group of people you want to reach in addition to women, people of color, others as well. so why wouldn t you double-check this? and maybe they did and the person they talked to didn t do a good job of it, but you ve created a controversy where this was supposed to be a really good thing and now it s turned into a bad thing, and that is exactly what you don t want as you re trying to celebrate a culture by
that s a group of people you want to reach in addition to women, people of color, others as well. so why wouldn t you double-check this? and maybe they did and the person they talked to didn t do a good job of it, but you ve created a controversy where this was supposed to be a really good thing and now it s turned into a bad thing, and that is exactly what you don t want as you re trying to celebrate a culture by denigrating that culture. christine brennen, thank you so much. i appreciate it. we ll be right back.