Warrants . The concern grows out of the fact that all of the failures and the and The Information that shouldved been given and wasnt given. And the question being what was the intent . What what washa their intention . Their motivation there. And what we determined was we couldnt definitively say what the motivation was. Are these pretty smart people . Fairly welleducated . At least welleducated. I dont know if theyre smart. I dont know if were very smart to beow honest with you. I was b going to say they have law degrees, right . At least somehe of them do. So you think the woods review for people at this level of the organization. To be clear, the stuff that didnt happen on the woods review was basic stuff. Yeah. You didnt need to be a deeplyexperienced fbi agent to be able to do it the right way. Well, thats my point. So wouldnt you think that would almost be muscle p memory for people who are going through this process to know they had an obligation to go through that . They clear
these reports w subsequent to tt in finding inappropriate, improper contact between agents and theop media. since our report last year, director ray has put out a new policy and ordered to take a new training to deal with that. or try too address that and to change theo culture, which is what we talked about a year ago. the culture and the viewpoint in a federal, criminal investigation, fairness to the defendant or the subject of the investigation. fairness to victims, if there are victims. fairness to the process requires people, agents who are working theseop cases, to keep their he down. work theea case. and not disclose information to outsidet parties. whether it s the media, friends, relatives, neighbors, whomever. that information has to stay in the office. and so there has been a policy change. but what are the repercussions if someone is found guilty of engaging in those unauthorized contacts with media?