are thinking about what s the answer on trans rights, things like changing language around breast feeding or talking about parents instead of mothers, it s an unnecessary erasure of language and identity, and i think people have to be sensitive to that. similarly, it s perfectly legitimate for people to disagree withjk rowling and her position on this, but you ve got to ask yourself, if you re in the business of winning hearts and minds, if someone likejk rowling has written a deeply personal piece in which she outlines very personal, painful experience of abuse, do you really think the way to win an argument for trans equality is to try and shut her down when she s made an argument in that context? so i think there s got to be a lot more empathy and understanding, and it does cut both ways. imean. just two seconds, there. for people listening to this, we re listening to the former head of education at stonewall.
rights must be respected. find i rights must be respected. and i don t disagree rights must be respected. and i don t disagree that rights must be respected. and i don t disagree that women s i rights must be respected. mr. i don t disagree that women s rights must be respected, and i think the lgbt has got to better empathise with that perspective and to understand why a whole generation of campaigners who fought for women s rights. i think sometimes when people are thinking about what is the answer on trans rights, things like changing language around breast feeding or talking about parents and that of mothers, it is an unnecessary erasure of language and identity. similarly, it is perfectly legitimate for people to disagree with jk perfectly legitimate for people to disagree withjk rowling and her position on this, but you have got to ask yourself, if you are in the business of winning hearts and minds, if someone likejk rowling has written a deeply personal piece in which
part of human rights. but in the end, the only way you win an argument is by having a discussion and a debate. tonally, i think lots of people will welcome what you re saying, but there will be plenty of people saying, hold on, women are women and there isn t a compromise to be had. women s rights must be respected. and i don t disagree that women s rights must be respected, and i think the lgbt movement has got to better empathise with that perspective and to understand why a whole generation of campaigners who fought for women s rights. i think sometimes when people are thinking about what s the answer on trans rights, things like changing language around breast feeding or talking about parents instead of mothers, it s an unnecessary erasure of language and identity, and i think people have to be sensitive to that. similarly, it s perfectly legitimate for people to disagree withjk rowling and her position on this, but you ve got to ask yourself,
that this is an area that conservatives have certainly felt more comfortable they on labour in recent weeks, where we seen labour politicians struggling with the definition of a man and a woman, and conservatives like borisjohnson making jokes about the sort of thing. again, this is an area of controversy i feel it creates more difficulties for the left than for the right to. difficulties for the left than for the right to difficulties for the left than for the right to. theiri difficulties for the left than for - the right to. their media the right to. on, emma. their media reall love the right to. on, emma. their media really love to the right to. on, emma. their media really love to put the right to. on, emma. their media really love to put people the right to. on, emma. their media really love to put people on - the right to. on, emma. their media really love to put people on the - really love to put people on the spot. really love to put people on the spot, especially