Stay updated with breaking news from Wit controversy. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Department for help is suing to try and get its money back plus costs. his excuse is accusing the company of ppe medical strongly rejects the claim. it accuses the government of having vasily over ruled it s on ppe and accusing the government of picking on the contracts on technicalities. it said it would demonstrate to the court it supplied it s gone so that government and with a competitive price. it was showed the utter incompetence of the department of health to procure ppe. during this period. and this is one of the contracts that was awarded through a vip lane at the start of the pandemic. so, more potential controversy there? controversy there? yes, the high-priority controversy there? yes, the high-priority lien controversy there? yes, the high-priority lien as - controversy there? yes, the high-priority lien as it - controversy there? yes, the high-priority lien as it is - controversy there? yes, the i high-priority lien as it is known ....
This match is under way. joining us now is salim kikeke, presenter at bbc africa and the world service. unbelievably, another penalty controversy? it unbelievably, another penalty controversy? unbelievably, another penalty controversy? unbelievably, another penalty controvers ? , , ~ ., ., controversy? it seems like the drama continues, controversy? it seems like the drama continues. it controversy? it seems like the drama continues, itjust controversy? it seems like the drama continues, itjust picked controversy? it seems like the drama continues, itjust picked up controversy? it seems like the drama continues, itjust picked up from - continues, itjust picked up from where it left 12 years ago. andre ayew missing a penalty, it wasn t a particularly good penalty, the match taking place is behind me, and of all the people, andre ayew, the captain of the black stars could not convert that penalty kick. it is still 0 0, will we see the end of this? still 0-0, will we see the end ....
Materials that nobody has read. it s essentially writing a book review. you ask the writer, did you read the book? almost nine out of ten of them read the book. is it controversy? there s nothing there but i m afraid that it really is trying to taint the opinion of the members. why don t they put it out? you know, you have constituti constitutional immunity. someone could put all of this classified information into the congressional record and even better the man in charge of classifying and declassifying is the president. if this is so valuable why hasn t the president declassified it? i think he would receive sharp review, probably put out the full body of evidence. they should be allowed. if the republicans are going to run it with so much hype they ....
Believe will probably be future indictments. wait a minute. it s a memo that includes information from a book? like a book that was made available to the public? no, i m using an analogy. they comment on classified materials that nobody, almost nobody has read. and so it s essentially writing a book review and then you ask the writer, did you read the book? nine out of ten of them said no. we haven t seen it yet. is it controversy or nontroversy? there is nothing there, but i m afraid it s trying to taint the members of our body. but why don t they put it out? you guys, as you know, sorry to tell you what you already know, but you have constitutional immunity for anything said during a speech or debate during the floor. somebody could just read this on the floor and then put all of this classified information into the congressional record. and even better, the man in charge of classifying and therefore declassifying is the president. so if this is so valuable, why hasn t the ....