premise of the question, yes google was hiding informationhe from its users, he effectively conceded. it was for their own good. according to feinberg, google didn t want to lead people down pathways that we would not find to be authoritative information. authoritative information. you ve heard that phrase a lot in the last year. authoritative information is the opposite of misinformation, or disinformation, or worse, a conspiracy theory. it s really important. all you are allowed to see is authoritative information. it s worth knowing in this and many w other cases, what is it? in this case, where did google get the authoritative information? in this case, they got that information from a group led byo a noted man of science, the nama sounds familiar, he almost single-handedly stopped all public speculation about the lab leak early in the pandemic. he did this in one swoop bye organizing a letter to the land standing as a known fact, there was no possibility of this virus, t
Premise of the question, Yes Google was Hiding Informationhe from its users, he effectively conceded. It was for their own good. According to feinberg, google didnt want to lead people down pathways that we would not find to be authoritative information. Authoritative information. Youve heard that phrase a lot in the last year. Authoritative information is the opposite of misinformation, or disinformation, or worse, a conspiracy theory. Its really important. All you are allowed to see is authoritative information. Its worth knowing in this and many w other cases, what is it . In this case, where did google get the authoritative information . In this case, they got that information from a group Led Byo A noted man of science, the nama sounds familiar, he almost singlehandedly stopped all public speculation about the Lab Leak early in the pandemic. He did this in one Swoop Bye organizing a letter to the Land Standing as a known fact, there was no possibility of this virus, the Coronaviru
On a podcast on youtube that was owned by google, by the way, to brag about how easy it is in the lab to manipulate coronavirus. coronavirus is a pretty good you know all of thisul stuff, but you can mimic it in the lab pretty easily. it drives a lot of what happens. so you can get the sequence build the protein, and insert into the backbone of another, do some work in the lab. tucker: in one of the great head hitting moments in recent history, we learned that the guy directing tied to experiments in wuhan was the very same guy telling the entire world this virus could have come from the wuhan lab. a conflict of interest anyone? it s absurd. it s beyond belief. what s amazing is google knew this.
You re doing better than anyone else i know what your age. brit hume, thank you. you bet. tucker: in news from washington tonight, we now know that eric swalwell, member of congress from california, is looking for someone, and we want to pardon the euphemism, to w expand his brand. that s right. swalwell is looking for a brand expander. we will tell you what that means, after the break. swalwella
Engineering to make it a case that we are intolerant to certain kinds of meat, certain kinds of bovine proteins. if that s something we can do through human engineering. we could address a really big world problems to human engineering. tucker: human engineering. why do we laugh at alex jones again? again, says the bioethicist human engineering is the answer. wait a second, you ask, human engineering? that s kind of creepy. didn t we try this kind of thing in europe 80 years ago, didn t we agree were not going to do that ever again? true. bioethicists have short memories. in any case, climate change is a pressing emergency, we don t have time to consider the consequences of a response to this existential crisis. t here s an idea, let s fiddle with the human genome to see if we can make human children smaller than they are now. a race of dwarves, they would