La Fiscalía de Nueva York recientemente solicitó al juez Kevin Castel que pusiera bajo secretividad la interceptación de una comunicación entre “personas distintas al acusado“ en el caso contra Juan Orlando Hernández. Según explicaron los fiscales, en junio de 2016 interceptaron comunicaciones elect.
for seeing the steel dossier but in a wiretap application, former, kaiser carter page used the dossier s claim. fox news covid the story extensively. there were obvious red flags from the very beginning. for one, christopher steele is working for an opposition research firm that responded by the hillary clinton campaign. cnn and msnbc didn t cover the story after 5:00 p.m. except for rachel. this report comes in the midst of an attack on christopher steele himself and republicans in congress. alleging he was peddling false information. she slammed john durham s case. the unmistakable impression is the indictment is designed spear christopher steele s intelligence report as things deliberately made up and concocted by democrats.
organizations including the washington post. yet, despite the enormous media attention to the russia investigation, including the dossier, the nbc, abc, and cbs evening newscast ignored the danchenko indictment yesterday. danchenko was charged with lying to the fbi about false information he fed to former british spy christopher steele, including unsubstantiated and salacious accusations against trump. danchenko allegedly fed some of his falsehoods to charles dollan, a former clinton administration official. the fbi had said it launched the russia probe before seeing the steele dossier. but in a wiretap application for former trump adviser carter page, the bureau used the dossier s claim. fox news covered the story extensively. there were obvious red flags with the dossier from the very beginning. for one thing, christopher steele was working for an opposition research firm called fusion gps which was funded by the hillary clinton campaign. cnn and msnbc did not cover the story a
lot about the weakness of their cases and their allegations. but the reality is this happened and the inspector general, this will be his fifth, fifth report that he has come out with regarding the fbi, the highest echelon and let s also remember. they didn t spend 18 months working on this to say hey, everybody went swimmingly at the department of justice. lisa: congressman, this was in the article itself. i m going to read this and i want to get your reaction to it. this is what it says it. says mr. horowitz concluded the fbi was careless and unprofessional in pursuing the page wiretap and he refused his findings in one instance to prosecutors for potential criminal charges over the alteration of a document in 2017 by a front line lawyer, kevin clinesmith, 37, in connection with the wiretap application. what strikes you about that paragraph from the report right there? well, despite the talking heads at the beginning of this introduction, yes, there was this application.
sandra: more on mr. cline smith and what he did here. he took an email from an official at another federal agency that contained several factual assertions. then added material to the bottom that looked like another assertion from the email s author when, it was, instead, his own understanding. mr. clinesmith include compiled for another official to read in signing an affidavit that would be submitted to the court attesting to the facts and analysis in the wiretap application. obviously we are going to learn a whole lot more why do you think we are getting this now? well so, why we are getting this now is there are certain individuals that are named in this report and criticized in this report together with folks at the department of justice that have seen it. i think some of these are peremptory to try to shape the message coming out of this report. my understanding this report is it s going to be very critical of not only the