talking about sexual violence, just talking about sexual violence publicly has changed. it was just not done in the way that we talk about it. i mean it was starting to bubble up, there were some public cases that had come to light in the years before that, certainly the case had started before, before the winestein case, the cases at fox had started before that, but nothing like the winestein case, before it hit the public, and so the public consciousness has changed since metoo went viral. definitely. one of the things that i think that people realize is how ubiquitous sexual assault and harassment is. i think that as you said, when it went viral, it was a moment where i think even men who were allied with like feminist movements or you know, being more aware that this is a problem that we need to tackle, they were even surprised by just
even rose mcgowan last week was saying she s still getting threats and innuendo about what she did with winestein. bill clinton s right hand man said, yeah. no one even blinked an eye. me too is over. if she said that in the height of me too joy might have had some trouble. now it s coming few circle. you can trash lewinsky now. it s fair game. i agree. she could be in trouble with with this. i d like to hear her answer some questions. isn t that topic for a real expose. they say they are for women but they are more about protecting political power, which is clintons have a lot of. i watched that clip just now. i believe my eyeballs are the real victims. you re right. the irony of the view is that it s supposed to be a woman s show. it s really an angry woman s show.
i believe you ll see that with winestein also. and i is are no problem with a just and righteous verdict if you get there in a fair way. when you cheat to get there, there s no justices in that verdict and that, is unfortunately what happened. hold on, one second i am with you the game has to be played, we all know, 100 men should on go free so one innocent is not punished wrongfully. i hear you. let s not fake the funk here either. you heard a jury hear testimony and they convicted him, it was not that it was all manipulation, this was a rule jury that got to hear it and found him guilty. you also had a jury that heard evidence that they should not have heard. both in the form of the deposition obtained illegally and you heard a jury evidence from frankly other bad act, other accusers that never should have been heard, we don t try people s characters we try crimes.
Transcripts for MSNBC Dateline 20200215 08:32:30 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
viewedad terrorism. meanwhile, actual terrorism by the left goes unpunished. in 2017 ah, left wing college professor, called erik clanton, smashed strangers in the head with a bike lock. why? because he believed they disagreed with his politics. clanton was charged with a felony, but then the charges were dropped and he spent no time in jail. how did that happen? that same year ah, left wing mob in north carolina destroyed a public statue they didn t like. because they felt like t. the whole thing was caught on video. somehow, nobody punished. evergreen college in wash state, a left wing mob, ordered professor wineto leave campus for having the wrong skin color. when he refused, the mob rioted, and he was forced to hold classes in public park. and he resigned and felt he had no choice. the people who threatened winestein were never punished. in other words, they won. violence won. this is all happening right now.