Stay updated with breaking news from Willie jay. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
For a reception and appear in front of 500 people in a room speech, itpublic should be recorded and theres no good reason why we should had to cede to his request that it not be recorded. Why did you . He wouldnt have come otherwise. On these remarks, its selfevident that they are thatrent in the sense other than justice kagan, theyve come from one cloistered life to another. To the priesthood is through the federal appellate these institutions are bundled up so when they get to the Supreme Court, they dont range of professions and exposures in public life that other Government People would have by the time they got high rung. Youre saying theyre different because they have super thin skin . Not because no, its because theyre transparency is not a technical issue or a legal cultural issue. When transparency is a technical issue, it fails, it almost always fails. If you look ....
Unknown, what other way can we casted out other than these similar cases . Other than running an experiment, that is our best guess. The evidence is extremely in favor of it. It cant be the case that only unimportant things, only ohio. That was the core argument when they decided to pull the tv cameras out of the prop 8. When the District Court was ready to roll. When the court issues its procure em, the argument is that it is too important. People care too much to have cameras. What is that argument . Only unimportant things should be televised . That decision had a substantive effect. If people could have watched that trial, they would have seen they would have seen ted olson ise destroyed any plausible publicpolicy argument against samesex marriage other than religious. That wouldve had a greater effect. That procedural decision was hugely important. It is interesting when judge walker handed down his decision in that case, thi ....
Common core standards. Then later a Hero Foundation forum on immigration. The Supreme Courts new term begins in three weeks, up next, a look at some of the key issues and cases the justices will consider, from the smithsonian institution, this is two hours. If you can hold your questions to the end, if you want to sit up straight and smile, you want to sit up straight in case youre in the picture. I have given you a handout with the speakers bios in order to leave them with as much time as possible to discuss the cases and to allow time at fend for your questions. But i do want to welcome them today. Our panel includes, ken snannagan, willie jay, who is a partner in the Litigation Department and cochair of its active litigation process. John biscubic, editor in charge at reuters. General donald varelli who represe ....
Happening in venezuela and they are financing and that there is also a move to move in this direction. Is there any is there any outside pressure or suggestions from abroad to maybe move a little bit more . I mean, i think that, you know, from the perspective of the brazilians that primarily are concerned with being repaid for their investments, so, you know, reforms that, you know, facilitate repayment, you know, green light those. They like. They like those. Green light those right away. In the case of the cubans, i think youre primarily concerned about the oil shipments. So i think have they stayed low . Yeah. No change . Not that im aware of. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So okay. I mean, i think that i could see from a certain perspective the cubans arguing for more a more flexible economy, considering the recent reforms they have made to their own system. I think that would be i think thats plausible in some ways. And i also think that the cubans may have an interest in wanting to reduce som ....
The guys at the morning Geezer Gang Gathering at the Short Stop were recently discussing some of the ins and outs of moving cattle. Their discussion awoke in my mind a bull story from the. ....