saying, look, we ve looked at this and there s nor widespread evidence of voter fraud that goes completely against what the president has been seeing. even in the last couple of hours, even tweeting, you know, more people who are suggesting that there is widespread voter fraud in the election was stolen from donald trump. chuck schumer, who s the leader of the democrats in the senate. when he was told what bill barr had said, he said, well, he s going to be the next one to be fired. bill barr has had an interesting relationship with donald trump. of course he was appointed because he was regarded as very loyal to donald trump. after jeff sessions was fired because he wasn t considered loyal enough. over the last couple of years, people have said he s acted more as donald trump s top lawyer rather than america s top lawyer. what is interesting is that has been a bit of a gap between donald trump and bill barr over the last few months, particularly because william barr did not
university. the notion is this our university should be empowered to look in the mirror and be honest with herself, we use it in a way of talking with leadership and talking about our society that institutions that are healthy and secure and should be willing to recognize whatever is going well and to be willing to say that we have a way to go. it s empowered to be honest with itself. in the subtitle which is shared leadership, culture change in academic success starts with the notion it s not about one person, is not just about the university president, it s about all of us working together with the vision of educating students, that is the notion of empowerment. i found the subtitle interesting because if you look at the cover of the book, you don t have one listed higher than the other or greater priority, you really have them almost laid out as a circle that we all rely on each other. that s exactly right. why was that you really tell important stories in this w
and again i want to thank politics and prose and also c-span for thinking enough of this series to come out and continue to cover. you don t get these kinds of people in this kind of room without getting this kind of coverage. i want to thank you all for being here tonight for our fifth installment. i want you to feel free, feel welcome, feel like home. come to the microphone, ask a question, intelligent, civil, and we will answer. and i want to come without further ado, introduce this great great pedal because we re going to get into some bullet points on their career and we re going to get into the discussion. discussion. i want to start off with someone who i have such respect for, such apparition, love four. dr. mary frances berry. she s a former head of the civil rights commission, you civil rights commission. she s also, she s got a list of things she s done. she s been jailed for fighting against apartheid in south africa. the list goes on and on, but she s also the au
the law that is in the legislative language that is in this supplemental. because i agree with our distinguished whip, mr. hoyer, and others who have said there are two things happening here. one is we need to address the challenge, the humanitarian challenge. we need resources to do that for particular purposes, and we should do that in the supplemental. another is to change the law which we shouldn t do in a supplemental. it is legislative legislating on an appropriations bill in a manner in which all kind of statements can be made which may be anecdotally significant but not significant in terms of the difference that they make a difference enough to change the law. and so when people talk about witnesses in one context or another, just saying something on the floor of the house, it s interesting. but there should be hearings, if we re going to change the law, there should be hearings where testimony can come forth, challenged, confirmed, whatever it may be. but a seri