quotation from william davy we ve all used several times in our testimony, a president without impeachment, a president will do anything to get reelected. thank you. i want to know you one more example proposof the president f of staff. let s be clear it s not quid pro quo? it is funding will not flow unless the investigation into the democratic server happened as well. we do that all the time with foreign policy. mckinney said yesterday he was very upset with the political influence in foreign policy. that was one of the reasons he was so upset about that. i have news for everybody. get over it. there will be political influence in foreign policy. professor karlan. i think mr. mulvaney is inflating or confusing two different notions of politics.
members of the constitutional convention actually moved to take out the impeachment provision from the draft constitution. and they had a reason for that, and the reason was they said well, the president will have to stand for re-election. and if the president has to stand for re-election, that is enough. we don t need a separate provision for impeachment. when that proposal was made, significant disagreement ensued. the governor of north carolina, a man called william davy, immediately said if the president cannot be impeached, quote, he will spare no effort or means whatever to get himself re-elected. a fierce republican critic of republican power said no point is no more important than that impeachment be included in the constitution. shall any man be above justice, he asked. thus expressing the core con
there is not a negligent standard that immunizes companies because they follow the same standards. if there is but a difference, it can only be treated to sex discrimination. i want to deal with in this instance, it is not just any old analysis we are using. we have statistical analysis that takes into account the factors such as performance in seniority. every industry in the united states may be guilty of sex discrimination. there is inequality of promotion for men and women. i do not take that position. what others trying to make clear is the fact that there are other companies in the same industries with the same problems. huang marge was behind the other large retailers walmart was behind the other large retailers. i cannot speak for the rest of society. i have no reason to believe that the entire society is engaged in employment discrimination. when do you think individualize hearings are required? when is the formula approach right and when are the indivi