and that $10,000 each on the counts of criminal solicitation, conspiracy, filing false documents and false statements. his attorney signing off on an agreement that includes this warning to their client, quote, the defendant should perform no act to intimidate any person known to him or her to be a codefendant or witness in this case or to otherwise obstruct the administration of justice. the agreement goes on to warn that includes social media and it comes as sources are telling cnn that employees with the fulton county sheriff s office are now being threatened over the role that they will play with the former presidents surrendered this week. we re going to go deep into all of that tonight, plus, a southern california clothing store owner hangs a rainbow pride flag outside of her business and his shot to death. we have the latest on developments in that investigation, and the angry reaction to state soccer chief giving an unwanted kiss on the lips to a women s world cup soc
justice correspondent evan perez, cnn special correspondent jamie jungle and cnn legal analyst, elliott williams. evan, i want to start with you so, the days went to be thursday. do you know anything more about what that s going to look like what the plan is for him? it s not going to look like any of the others and that s kind of a strange thing to say. the former, president this is his fourth time being arrested and processed as part of an indictment part of answering chain charges. in this case, the sheriff s office in atlanta says they re going to treat him like any other defendant. he s got a lot of different when he turned himself in in new york and certainly in the federal system that then within a mugshot. and this, case they are going to take a mugshot and fingerprints, they re going to do all the things we normally. do that s a choice, they don t necessarily have to do. it right, they ve chosen to do it like they ve done others. and, importantly, he s going to b
it comes but once a year for politics junkies, it is the christmas and new year s and arbor day and obscure state specific holiday you can t really remember the reason for rolled into one. it is state of the union night, and we are so happy that you re here with us for it. here s a live look at the u.s. capital tonight. members of both chambers of congress, guess, supreme court justices, cabot secretaries, admirals, ambassadors, they re all gathering to hear this big heavy on the pomp and circumstance annual address the president of the united states. on the other end of pennsylvania avenue of the white house, we are watching for president biden to part from the white house for the capital. the is expected shortly. i am rachel maddow here at msnbc headquarters. joined by my colleagues of chris hayes, joy reid, nicole wallace, alex wagner and ari melber. i also do mean it when i say thank you for being home with us. we know you had every choice in the world were to watch thi
That other election interference case. they re accusing trump s lawyers of exaggerating the time it will take to do this document review. are they right? they re absolutely right. but that s also incredibly common when parties negotiate over when a trial, or anything, is going to happen. one party, to the defendant, will say, no, we need plenty of time. the volumes, stacks and boxes we need to be able to go through. and the prosecution will set, you know, will push back on. that the judge will find a date somewhere in the middle there. so on to take time to get to trial. this is not going to take until 2026 to go to trial. there that some funny business. what do you think, evan, the doj is looking for here in terms of the timeline? look, i think they set an aggressive timeline of january knowing that they re probably not going to get it. but i do think that, you know, from watching that judge, watching judge chutkan on the stage, it is clear that she believes that this case nee
More time, the volume, stacks of boxes we need to go through and the prosecution will set, will push back on. that the judge will find a date somewhere in the middle there, it s going to take time to get to trial, it will not take until 2026 to go to trial. that s some funny business. what do you think the doj is looking for here in terms of timeline? they set an aggressive time of january, knowing that they are probably not going to get it. but i think, watching that judge on the stand, it is clear that she believes this case needs to go to trial, before the election. she believes that this is an important thing for the public, and certainly for voters. i think they believe that they are in a good place to get this trial by early summer. and then, it puts the onus on some of the other judges to try a maneuver around that. if she has a trial date, then some of the other procedural hearings in the other cases are