Stay updated with breaking news from Will nadler. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Republican and then what happens . Yeah, and then at that point, any member can simply say they move to offer an amendment. And when they offer an amendment, they have to actually provide the next of that language to the clerk. The amendment could be read aloud before all of the members of The Committee. And then each of the members can simply say they want a chance to talk and to speak about that particular amendment. And as you said, there are 41 members of this committee. 40 are expected to attend one is not, ted lieu because of health issues. Hes not expected to be here this week. But each of those members could speak. That could take time for each individual amendment. When that amendment is voted down which we expect because republicans are expects to offer amendments, democrats are happy with these articles and dont plan to do that. Thats why this is unpredictable how this contentious day will play out, wolf. 40 members now. ....
He s not going to be here. they read his statement last night. there s jerry nadler, the chairman of the committee getting ready to bring down the gavel and open this session. jeffrey toobin is with us as well. do we anticipate as part of this process we will actually read the two articles of impeachment before the committee members? am i allowed to say i don t know. you aren t allowed to say that. i i don t know. let me ask manu. maybe he knows. manu, you still there? yeah, i am. will nadler read the two articles of impeachment? they re 10, 12 pages. he can. that is something within his rights. they can also decide to waive the reading of those amendments to those articles in order to speed the proceedings. we expect at least him to read some of these aloud. we ll see if he reads the entire text of this. that s how they ll probably play out today. the question the democrats have been told to clear their ....
Say what you want about schiff. i m a fan. he ran a great hearing. kept everybody in line. nadler we ll see if he can do that. that s the republican strategy. bill: if you were to give a witness from the white house you add legitimacy. the president is taking questions now. we anticipated this heading for london for the nato anniversary. 70 years marking the alliance. you ll have a split screen on wednesday. sure. bill: in the judiciary committee in washington, d.c. while the president is holding an international press conference in london. how is that going to go? i disagree with my esteemed colleague. this process has been a disaster. what did you hear from the major witnesses? there wasn t bribery, nobody had a first-hand account of it. by and large most of the witnesses said it wasn t a quid pro quo. they didn t know about it. we ll have the next round of hearings when the president is at nato and going to dominate. ....
Matt gates and others they will be coming in to blow this thing up from the beginning. will nadler keep his cool? bill: they have the votes. what are you suggesting about nadler? can he keep his cool. schiff did a good job. adam schiff who loves the limelight and screwed himself up several times prior to this by seeking the camera more than his duties, this time did a good job. he kept it together and kept his mouth shut most of the time and led the committee effectively. jerry nadler will face a more contentious situation. the judiciary committee is hell is popping. they have all kinds of people. sandra: why would the white house issue the letter put a why are they turning down the opportunity to have representation in the room? because they don t have the facts on their side. they ll use louie go mert and a bunch of other people to blow up the hearings. jerry nadler the last time he had a committee hearing wasn t pretty. ....