Palestinians, two states for two people palestinians, two states for two people. Let me be clear, none of these people. Let me be clear, none of these partnerships are about containing any country, they are atrout containing any country, they are about a containing any country, they are about a positive vision for our shared about a positive vision for our shared future. When it comes to china, shared future. When it comes to china, i shared future. When it comes to china, i want to be clear and consistent. We seek to responsibly manage consistent. We seek to responsibly manage competition between our countries manage competition between our countries so it does not take into conflict countries so it does not take into conflict i countries so it does not take into conflict. I have said we are for tierisking, conflict. I have said we are for de risking, not decoupling with china de risking, not decoupling with china we de risking, not decoupling with china. We will push back on aggressi
A talented and patriotic person who is doing a very important job. and i think that s what is so elegant about this decision is that when you actually took the time to find out who witt was, and what she did, the outcome was inevitable. i think that your point is still a very good one that it is it does appear to be the courts that are most likely to address this policy. which has always been built on what is can be described as a not so noble lie. that, you know, that gays and lesbians are a threat to military readiness. and this case puts the lie to that assertion. but it also, rachel, is very similar to what we saw with the civil rights movement in terms of african-americans. that congress has never been particularly brave in terms of constitutional rights or civil liberties. the courts have often stepped in and with the civil rights movement, it was the courts that