all the way through midterms. is the rolling back of a fundamental right, is that the thing that takes this out of the realm of the abstract and allows people to start thinking about the court and all of the mechanics that kim was just talking about, that claire is pointing to, we ve all been talking about, how the federalist society, the right-wing money machine, all this stuff, citizens united was not a mistake, it was an act of policy, it was an ideologically driven court that was carrying out the interests of its backers. all of this there s an incredible nest of things that are going on here. and a lot of people know them and don t do very much about them. i wonder whether dobbs, because it s translated into such a visceral, tenable thing for so many americans, whether dobbs and opportunities precedented. we ve never seen anything like it before. a fundamental right pulled back after 50 years of precedent. does that change the way america looks at the court not just in lowerin