Disregard house rules. For what purposes . Just completelyusrules on not i wanted to confirm point addressing the Minority Hearing today. If i hear t that one more time, of order is the rules of ill address that when were decorum. I dont believe the gentleman marking up impeachment articles. What is the use of a minority from florida meant to violate him andnt i want to give him to hearing day if youre going have benefit of o doubt. To hear evidence of the markup than once he referred if you get the confirmation of to a new york lawyer. If hek is prepared to explain what he meant, i will withdraw the master bedroomrkup yourself. My Point Of Order. Even the most heated development does not know show any way that that is not a recognizable Point Of Order. Mr. Chairman, Point Of Order can be theyre. If you destroy the institutional regarding the schedule. There is no Point Of Order integrity, which again, the staff have talked about today, regarding the schedule. Well, onf this case there
consider those three explanations? and if so, what didmm the evidee show about whether president trump s request was actually motivated by those concerns? it s a very good question. there are two things that were discussed here today. one is evidence and one is assertions andd opinions. based on the evidence, there is noe, evidence to support any of those three things that you just mentioned. there is no evidence to think that the president acted towards ukraine because of his concerns about corruption, even if he held those concerns. that was not the motivating factor. there is no evidence that his concern aboutha other european countriesab giving enough money motivated him, and there is certainly not a reasonable belief given all of the evidence that he believed that ukraine interfered in our 2016 elections. thank you. i d like to close with what our scholars explained to us last week about why all of this is so important. t drawing a foreign government