Committee and on the association and im speaking for the board today. I want to address a particular aspect of the environmental report and that is alternative c. Thats opening to vehicular traffic. You want you to urge the Planning Department to support this alternative. As currently planned, there are two openings for vehicular traffic in and out of the reservoir site and a third access point would be provided. Mitigating some of the lockedin nature of the suit. When it was concluded that thisd reduce bottlenecks into the neighborhood and this would extend site traffic and can be acom datad withouaccommodated ig neighborhood. The draft states that opening this would redistribute traffic from ocean avenue and fredda calloway resulting in transit delay and this would provide emergency vehicles better access. Further, it would result project generated Traffic Volume at lee avenue which is identified in the draft report as a troublesome intersection with a lot of projected congestion. In
I want to put this picture here because you see so many pictures of this parking lot completely empty. We need to have a counterbalance. Of course, its not always this fall but more towards this end of the spectrum than the empty lots you see in the developers promotional materials. Lastly, in the january 9t january 9th meeting melina cohen says this, quote, i believe avalon bay will create a lot of problems for this. Thank you, maam i apologize those that are relationships in labor and many times they have come here, our labor parters have come here and havent hired labor union do the job. It should be mandated to use local union labor. S thank you. Thank you, next speaker. Monica collins. This is prepared. The scir states transit delay introduced by the project will be i insignificant and this is based on delay on part of the consultants. The performance standards allow for a fourminute delay for an entire route but the travel from the reservoir along fredda spawc llowafredda callowa
Go over the sites design and program of the master plan. San franciscos Housing Affordability and shortage has long been an issue and the city has developed several policies and programs to attract them. In 2014, propertie proposition d with 33 units being affordable. In support of proposition k, former mayor ed lee launched the public land for Housing Program calling for 4,000 units on public land by 2020. 50 of which will be affordable. So the Planning Department and the office of Economic Workforce Development to select the site, public land especially that can be built for housing and also provide Public Benefits those four sites are initial sites. There are more sites not shown in the map. They can help reach 27 of the targeted 4,000 units. The balboa website is in the south was nearby the balboa park station right next to city college of San Francisco, just north of ocean avenue commercial district surrounded by neighborhoods like sunny side, inkel side. This is under utilized 17
Is this the Planning Department that we the citizens of San Francisco are paying for . Were playing for a Planning Department that is not examining the cost of transportation and the dangers of transportation increasing the gridlock. You are responsible for this. Frankly, again, as i raised earlier, the mayor and the developers are running San Francisco and they dont give a damn as long as they can make profit by building more construction. This is insane. Its outrageous. The fact you have nothing to say about it, you dont get to the specifics tells me you really dont care either about what is going on in San Francisco. The gridlock is a responsibility of the Planning Department. You are improving more and more construction, Mass Construction without agreeing there should be transportation, proper transportation. Thats political incompetence and malfeasance in my view. Where is the Planning Commission . Where is the director of planning in San Francisco about the gridlock . What is you
Damn as long as they can make profit by building more construction. This is insane. Its outrageous. The fact you have nothing to say about it, you dont get to the specifics tells me you really dont care either about what is going on in San Francisco. The gridlock is a responsibility of the Planning Department. You are improving more and more construction, Mass Construction without agreeing there should be transportation, proper transportation. Thats political incompetence and malfeasance in my view. Where is the Planning Commission . Where is the director of planning in San Francisco about the gridlock . What is your solution in 2050 . Can we get by next year with all this new construction . All this new construction in San Francisco is going to add massively to a transportation gridlock but its not on your radar. Again, where is the Planning Commissioner is the executive director of planning . Whats their plan for all the new construction. Is it a massive transit, a Public Transit bei