now congress failure to reel in post-pandemic spending is forcing the central bank to tighten credit, choke spending and heighten risk of recession. in reality, this is not debate about spending, but who is going to do the spe spending. todd: alexandria hoff has more. alexandria: june 1 is the day the treasury secretary janet yellen has given for when it is debt limit must be resolved, if not, world implications would follow. today president biden and kevin mccarthy will meet after what was called a productive phone call last night. i just finished a phone call with the president, he s flying back on air force one. we re talking about his trip there and positive things that took place and spent time talking about the debt ceiling and where we are and i believe it was a productive phone call. we can solve some problems if he understands what we re looking at. we have to spend less money. alexandria: the president arrived back from washington. in japan, president biden
he s got caught, and the man practically has the legal version of an ankle bracelet around him. and he can t leave the five boroughs. i don t care how you feel about joe biden, you must vote for him. progressive power and the revenge of the normies. we have to win more. we re going to win more. we are going to celebrate. we re going to party the day drinking. great news in case anybody wondering fani willis keeps dancing, but the music s about to stop. th i probably smoked more parmesan cheese thanknow anyone. anyone that you know. i m sure hunter biden, irs whistleblowers and the cia. plus, i m not playing with you in new york. i m giving you this love. it s a love rampage. hear, hear. normies are revolting and they want to mak revoltie america normal again. former cia analyst martin guri ,one of the good guys, says we re living through a great global battlinrough e for powerl a clash of classes between the normies. ordinary people who just want to work, get ma
watters primetime . tonight. fani willis keeps dancing but the music is about to stop. probably smoke more parmesan cheese than anyone that you know i m sure. hunter biden, irs whistleblowers and the cia. plus. i m not playing with you. it s a love rampage. [ ] [ ] jesse: here here. nor mews are revolting and they want to make america normal again. former cia analyst, one of the good guys, says we are living through a great global battle for power. a clash of classes between the normies, ordinary people who want to work, it married, have children and get on with their lives, and the elites who wish to change everything. sex, the climate, our history, your automobile, your diet, even though straws with which you slurp your smoothie. for them, there is no good and evil, no right and wrong, only oppressors and oppressed. every transaction demands their intervention to protect designated oppressed groups. the elites need total control over the information s fear beca
admitting that these facts were so inextricably intertwined in a colloquy with justice barrett, that it would be very difficult to separate them out on remand. that s how i interpreted his statements. please to translate that for people watching, that means that basically, if it wasn t official act, they would not be able to use that potentially at trial. he was arguing they should be able to use it to paint a bigger picture. but trump has argued, total immunity. he has not said, well, some of these are private x. this would mean the case could at least in part go forward and go to trial, we believe that without the official acts charged in the indictment, there is no case. we ve been very consistent in our position from the start, starting with the district court proceeding through the circuit. now at the us supreme court, that what we re talking about is absolute immunity. yes. but absolute immunity just for a president s official acts in office. i think that s a cruc
i m period in question. i thought in many what we did a concession at all was michael dreeben essentially admitting the attorney for the special counsel s office, essentially admitting that these facts were so inextricably intertwined in a colloquy with justice barrett, that it would be very difficult to separate them out on remand. that s how i interpret for his statements at least. well, and to translate that for people watching, that means that basically, if it wasn t official act, they would not be able to use that potentially at trial. he was arguing they should be able to use it to paint a bigger picture. but trump has argued, total immunity. he has not said, well, some of these are private x this would mean the case could at least in part go forward and go to trial. we believe that without the official acts charged in the indictment, there is no case. we ve been very consistent in our position from the start, starting with the district court proceeding through