commons today he comes to the house of commons and says, i m awfully sorry, i don t commons and says, i m awfully sorry, i don t recognise a party when i see one! i don t recognise a party when i see one! that i don t recognise a party when i see one! that is i don t recognise a party when i see one! that is absolutely bizarre. so i think one! that is absolutely bizarre. so i think that one! that is absolutely bizarre. so i think that people s rage, as he put it. i think that people s rage, as he put it. is i think that people s rage, as he put it, is more than understandable, and the put it, is more than understandable, and the question about apologies is always and the question about apologies is always not and the question about apologies is always not if you are sorry, it is what always not if you are sorry, it is what do always not if you are sorry, it is what do you always not if you are sorry, it is what do you then do. these actions speak what do you th
that code says ministers who knowingly mislead parliament will be expected to offer their resignation. the party is over, prime minister. the only question is will the british public kick him out, will his party kick him out, or will he do the decent thing and resign? mr speaker, ijust want to repeat that i think that the right honourable gentleman and i know that it is his objective and he is paid to try to remove me from office, mr speaker, and i appreciate that and i accept that but may i humbly suggest to him that he should wait until the enquiry has concluded and he should study it for himself, and i will certainly respond as appropriate and i hope that he does. but in the meantime, yes, mr speaker, i certainly wish that things had happened differently on the evening of may the 20th, mr speaker, and i apologise for all the misjudgments that have
there that this is continuing because there is that this is continuing because there is a that this is continuing because there is a continuing enquiry. and he has there is a continuing enquiry. and he has said there is a continuing enquiry. and he has said that when that enquiry is concluded, that the findings will be published and there will be an opportunity for a further discussion. but in the short term, i think discussion. but in the short term, i think that discussion. but in the short term, i think that this is a monumental relief think that this is a monumental relief to think that this is a monumental relief to myself and lots of other colleagues, because we didn t think he would colleagues, because we didn t think he would be able to carry on if he didnt he would be able to carry on if he didn t answer the basic question as to whether didn t answer the basic question as to whether or not he was there. and he has to whether or not he was there. and he has
of people who simply would not see it that way people who suffered terribly, people who were forbidden from meeting loved ones at all, inside or outside. and to them, and to this house, i offer my heartfelt apologies. and all i ask is that sue gray be allowed to complete her enquiry into that day and several others, so that the full facts can be established. and i will of course come back to this house and make a statement. in response, the labour leader, sir keir starmer, told the commons that borisjohnson s keir starmer, told the commons that boris johnson s defence keir starmer, told the commons that borisjohnson s defence was ridiculous and he should do the decent thing. mr speaker, so we ve got the prime minister attending downing street parties a clear breach of the rules. we ve got the prime minister putting forward a series of ridiculous denials which he knows are untrue a clear breach of the ministerial code.