We Dont Nope News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from We dont nope. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In We Dont Nope Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Good to have you. do we know anything more about the settlement that may have went directly to virginia? we don t nope the amount but there are rumors swirling in london it is about $10 million. that s what it seems to be. certainly lawyers i ve spoken to who are split three ways, not equally three ways but will cover the legal costs, one split. it will also there will be a sizable donation to that charity. the lawyers tell me there is compensation that will go directly to jennifer jeffrey. now that s not really been flagged up and my understanding about that is there is a little bit of spin going on behind the scenes where prince andrew s team is very keen to say he s ....
Have good that that? the global equity issue came up. half the world has not gotten any vaccine. martha: no, it s a great point. you have to look at the whole globe in terms of immunizing people to knock this back and knock back the variants that are potentially developing as well. the other thing that i hear no discussion about and we talked about this with regard to young people, many who have had covid, we don t have any studies, the cdc gets millions of dollars to do research. yet the united states of america is relying inisraelly studies. we don t nope the benefit of having had covid and one shot in young people. that may be that that is sufficient to give them imm immunity, correct? yes. if there s a wake-up call to the united states, how are we getting the biggest study worldwide out of israel showing ....
0 ahead of that messaging before the science had before that regulators were on the same page with them. john: , and on the immigration front, the mayor of del rio, texas, is on the extraordinary pictures. they declared a state of emergency in his town. thanks for being with us on this friday martha: thanks, john and jacqui. a lot of breaking news. i m martha maccallum in new york. any moment now, there you can see the podium is set up at the pentagon. a huge development breaking right now as we are told that officials are about to announce that no isis-k fighters were killed in the august 29th u.s. drone strike in kabul that killed ten civilians in fact. there s no disciplinary action we re told expected as a result of that obvious misstep, mistake, whatever you want to call it. a lot of questions moments away about what happened with what was said to be a great example of our over-the-horizon ability to take out targets in afghanistan despite the fact that we pulled out. so there ....
Extraordinarily serious development. it means that somebody who is an intelligence professional, reporting sort of an temporary assignment to the white house, heard the president say something that was so alarming to them, that they went to the inspector general of the intelligence community, the proper channels, that the inspector general independently determined that this was an urgent a concern. that statutory definition means it is a flagrant and serious ongoing violation of the law or serious abuse. that now the director of national intelligence and the white house are getting involved and attempting to hide it from congressional committees. so really, you know, we don t nope the substance of the complaint. we don t know who exactly the foreign leader is, but by all indications, this is an extraordinarily serious matter. so here s the big question for anyone watching, juliette. will the american public find out what that promise was and who it was made to? well, there s a se ....
Agency other than the intelligence community with some sort of privileged communications they felt made this that couldn t be shared with congress. that immediately screams out to a lot of reporters is some sort of white house executive privilege. we don t nope the answer to that yet. when i raise the issue of classified material, i m just saying that say the president provided, promised, suggested he was going to provide something that was very sensitive, say intel sources and methods. that would make a lot of people rear up their heads and be very concerned if the foreign leader was an adversary or the information could be exploited, could put our national security or our allies at risk. still, the president has the authority to declassify as he chooses. he s the ultimate power there. i m not saying that you couldn t share this kind of whistleblower ....