Live Breaking News & Updates on We Dont Know Which Side
Stay updated with breaking news from We dont know which side. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
We need to keep everything in the bill if we time limit it or jigger with the numbers to make sure it all stays in. their focus is getting every one of these things on the book so they will be harder to take away and live on in perpetuity. we don t know which side will win their. paul: is that at all realistic, kim, i mean, keeping everything in? there is no way. especially if it is true they want to admit on how many taxes are hiked or a number of 1.5 trillion. at a certain point not even in liberal fantasy magic number world you can call those programs in any realistic form. paul: the progressive form is if you keep them all in that even if they are phased out, in their legislation, republicans will lack the will to eliminate them down the road. when we come back, the debate over the biden vaccine mandate heats up as a new rule comes one ....
you never had a conversation? no. i didn t. i never did. and did you ever tell him to other people to get in touch with him? never did. did roger stone ever give the president a heads up on wikileaks and concerning dnc. no, he didn t. not at all? i don t believe so. wikileaks, which i had nothing to do with i mean, april, if what michael cohen said today is true and again i say if, although he certainly seemed to be very credible today, then all of those things are just blatant lies. right. erin, someone along the way is lying. we don t know which side. the sad piece is that everyone has a credibility issue. who do you believe? but you ask the right question. why are people lying? we understand why michael cohen would lie. he was being loyal and trying to protect and it is not a good thing but we understand. he said he was being loyal, trying to protect this man. he thought he was larger than life. but why is if the president is lying, why is he lying and ....
Goes. he would be advised by his deputy and other people at the justice department. i suspect what s going on from the justice department perspective is that they institutionally are very worried about sharing classified material with congress given that in the past when i ve done that, they sometimes get burned. harris: what you mean in the past? he meaning of the last few week weeks? it s just been leaking like a sieve. tom: there are concerns about secrecy and in some they may be misplaced. in some they are legitimate. harris: the public has the same concern. we are all watching the leaks two. kennedy: we don t know who to believe. that s what s so confusing about it. if we don t know which side is telling the truth of what the motivation is anymore. tom: harris: my lips are g but is going to be tom s words. tom: here s the thing and ....
They have changed significantly. they ve improved and as i said earlier, the fundamentals of syria are secular and i believe will stale ta way. i think it s very important to point out again, as you just said, it s a secular state. they would reject radical islamists and they in some cases in the areas of which they have troll the people are demonstrating against them is the information i have. so when weep see these commentators say, well, we don t know which side will win, we don t know who the bad guys are, if you agree with this assessment, we certainly know who the bad guys are. is that correct? i believe we do. for the most part. for the most part. there are some worse than al nusra, and they send to be most of them in northern area and the east. i thank you. and again, i d like to ask again, can you assure the committee that the administration does not see a ....
Obegi s assessment of the opposition? i agree with most of that. they ve changed significantly, they ve improved, and as i said earlier, the fundamentals of syria are secular and i believe will stay that way. and i think it s very important to point out again, as you just said, it s a secular state. they would reject radical islamists, and they in some cases, in the areas in which they have control, the people have demonstrating against them, is the information i have. so when we see these commentators say, well, we don t know which side would win, we don t know who the bad guys are, if you agree with this assessment, we certainly know who the bad guys are. is that correct? i believe we do, for the most part. there are some worse than al nusra, and they tend to be in the northern area and the east. i thank you. and again, i would like to ask again, can you share with the ....