Wasnt plausible, Wasnt Believable but it was at least relatively co teernt. To recap, Michael Cohen and his surrogates on tv had been claiming for months that Michael Cohen, the president s attorney, facilitated as cohen put it 130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels who says she had an affair with the president 12 years ago. Now, the money came out of cohens pocket allegedly taken from a Home Equity Line of credit we were told. The president had not repaid it. In fact, mr. Trump knew nothing about it they claimed and despite coming as it did in the closing days of the campaign the payment supposedly had absolutely nothing to do with the election. Nothing to do with skel change an embarrassing story 11 days before the election. On wednesday night Rudy Guiliani went on fox and said this to sean hannity about the daniels payoff. Its not Campaign Money. No Campaign Finance violation. They funneled it through a law firm. Funneled through a law firm and the president repaid it. Oh, i didnt know h
sometimes it s nothing. it s like a needle in a hay stack. sometimes it s a gold mine. when that happens it can break a case wide-open. but, the reality is a lot of the things in those handwritten notes, and former that isn t already in the mueller report, already made it in or wasn t important enough to bother with. so that may be what we re talking about here. you re skeptical of what we could find? i am. but at the same time this is not an ordinary investigation. the kind of thing that didn t make it into the mueller report could be scandalous words that just weren t verifiable or credible. you might find certain witnesses may have said some terrible things about the administration, about president trump, but maybe agents determined that this just wasn t believable and shown go in the report. that would be very interesting. what does this deal mean for the standing subpoenas out for
wasn t plausible, wasn t believable but it was at least relatively co teernt. to recap, michael cohen and his surrogates on tv had been claiming for months that michael cohen, the president s attorney, facilitated as cohen put it $130,000 payment to stormy daniels who says she had an affair with the president 12 years ago. now, the money came out of cohen s pocket allegedly taken from a home equity line of credit we were told. the president had not repaid it. in fact, mr. trump knew nothing about it they claimed and despite coming as it did in the closing days of the campaign the payment supposedly had absolutely nothing to do with the election. nothing to do with skel change an embarrassing story 11 days before the election. on wednesday night rudy guiliani went on fox and said this to sean hannity about the daniels payoff. it s not campaign money. no campaign finance violation. they funneled it through a law firm. funneled through a law firm and the president repaid it. oh, i
daniels story. until now at least michael cohen s story was clear, it wasn t plausible, wasn t believable but it was at least relatively coherent. to recap, michael cohen and his surrogates on tv had been claiming for months that michael cohen, the president s attorney, facilitated, as cohen put it, a $130,000 payment to stormy daniels who says she had an affair with the president 12 years ago. now, the money came out of cohen s pocket allegedly, taken from a home equity line of credit we were told. the president had not repaid it. in fact, mr. trump knew nothing about it they claimed and despite coming as it did in the closing days of the campaign the payment supposedly had absolutely nothing to do with the election. nothing to do with squelching an embarrassing story 11 days before the election. on wednesday night rudy guiliani went on fox and said this to sean hannity about the daniels payoff. it s not campaign money.
you told them your story. they actually didn t think it was very credible, even though off the record they said dylan believes your story, but clearly when they came back they said it wasn t believable. dylan? dylan howard. he s with ami. so they had like a 12-hour window to i m probably skipping around, i m sorry, 12-hour window to accept whether they wanted the story or not. once donald trump won the republican nomination, you re saying ami suddenly came back to you with interest in the story? to keith, yes, for the story, yeah. why do you think it was that it was after donald trump was the republican nominee that they came back? they wanted to squash the story. you re saying they wanted to protect donald trump? i m assuming so, yeah. but the offer, which we didn t discuss or haven t discussed, was they offered me a big, you