covid s that ended up being true. watch this. there were things obviously. , maybe factual but may not be harmful. are you going to censor someone for being harm if there s no harm the occasion of what they re doing? but there are other places where they take the stuff around covid earlier in the pandemic, real health implications but that hasn t been time to vet the scientific assumptions. a lot of the establishment, waffled on a bunch of facts and asked for things to be censored, more debatable or true. convenient is the word i have for that. it s kind of convenient to say that now when a majority of americans are over covid moving past it. before i go to one of you, this is mark zuckerberg talking about the 18 million post they did remove. if we see harmful misinformation on the platform and we take down, it s against our policy. when you see this, what you think? it reminds me of the hunter biden laptop story where only 18 months after the fact that all these ne
the kids. happy birthday, grandpa. i said great. a got 400 years of proximity. add them all up. a fake 400 years. thank you, darling. that is so nice. it s a wonderful birthday. we are going to make it into the greatest birthday of all. when caught, hillary then deleted and acid wash. nobody does that because of the expense, but it s pretty conclusive. 33,000 e-mails in defiance of a congressional subpoena. they already launch the subpoena. it was there when she decided to delete, acid wash and smash and destroy her sell phones with a hammer. and then they say participated in obstruction? now think of it. that is called obstruction. there has never been obstruction as grave as that. she did this in the face of everything, and yet nobody did anything about it. the fbi and the doj protected her and did not issue subpoenas. they did not use a grand jury and did not execute search warrants. and then the corrupt head of the fbi james comey declared no reasonable prosecutor would b
covid s that ended up being true. watch this. there were things obviously. , maybe factual but may not be harmful. are you going to censor someone for being harm if there s no harm the occasion of what they re doing? but there are other places where they take the stuff around covid earlier in the pandemic, real health implications but that hasn t been time to vet the scientific assumptions. a lot of the establishment, waffled on a bunch of facts and asked for things to be censored, more debatable or true. convenient is the word i have for that. it s kind of convenient to say that now when a majority of americans are over covid moving past it. before i go to one of you, this is mark zuckerberg talking about the 18 million post they did remove. if we see harmful misinformation on the platform and we take down, it s against our policy. when you see this, what you think? it reminds me of the hunter biden laptop story where only 18 months after the fact that all these ne
and laura, the kids. happy birthday, grandma happy and nice. oh, great. they just got charged with. they went for 100 years approximately. if you add them all up, a fake . a fake 400 years ago. thank you, darling. that s so nice. it s a wonderful birthday. so we re going to make it into the greatest birthday of all. well, when hillary then deleted and acid washed, nobody does that because of the expense, but it s pretty conclusive 33,000 emails in defiance of a congressional subpoena already launched. the subpoena was there and she decided to delete acid wash and then smash and destroy her cell phones with a hammer. and then they say, i participated in obstruct. now think of it. that s called obstruction. there s never been obstruction as grave as that. she did this in the face of everything. and yet nobody did anything about it. the fbi, the doj protected her, did not issue subpoenas, did not use a grand jury, did not execute search warrants. and then the corrupt hea
covid s that ended up being true. watch this. there were things obviously. , maybe factual but may not be harmful. are you going to censor someone for being harm if there s no harm the occasion of what they re doing? but there are other places where they take the stuff around covid earlier in the pandemic, real health implications but that hasn t been time to vet the scientific assumptions. a lot of the establishment, waffled on a bunch of facts and asked for things to be censored, more debatable or true. convenient is the word i have for that. it s kind of convenient to say that now when a majority of americans are over covid moving past it. before i go to one of you, this is mark zuckerberg talking about the 18 million post they did remove. if we see harmful misinformation on the platform and we take down, it s against our policy. when you see this, what you think? it reminds me of the hunter biden laptop story where only 18 months after the fact that all these ne