Stay updated with breaking news from Wards dastardly. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Candidates, nominees from president republican president s have learned a lot about how to deal with the hearings. When you heard kavanaugh say as he did, talking about the parties to the case that theyre Flesh And Blood Human Beings and we need to have empathy for them and real world consequences of the court are very important. As a political matter, great stuff. A legal matter, its nonsense. Were youre an Appellate Judge and an issue comes before you, the issue is not the parties. Youre to resolve the legal issues. Its a purely legal matter. The parties may happen to be the case that they pick to do that. Now, obviously its as well as a human being to say you care about the parties, yes, you should, but thats smart to say that. Bork said when he was asked about why he wanted to be on the court back then, he said among other things, he said it was an intellec ....
To investigations while in office. you said in our meeting that congress would likely act quickly if the president does something in your wards dastardly, a word that you used in the article. i m struggling with the practical implications of that. what about a president that commits murder or if she jeopardizes national security or he obstructs an investigation or white collar crime. how do you differentiate between these crimes when you characterize them as dastardly? there s several issues going on in that question, senator. the first thing i want to underscore is that what i wrote in the minnesota law review was in 2009 when president obama was president or becoming president, was thoughts on a variety of topics reflecting on my experience i want to pick up the tempo with my questions because i have so many of them. could we get to that point about the dastardly? ....
We know something is dastardly or not if we can t investigate it? you re asking for is it a high crime i m asking about your position that a president should not be subject to investigations while in office. the dastardly are you you re only saying that they should be subject to investigation as part of an impeachment and there s no other investigation that could occur? is that no. on constitutional position object criminal investigation and prosecution, i did not take a position on the constitutionality period. the idea that i talked about is something for congress to look at if it wanted. that s point one. point two is the idea that what is an impeachable offense. ....