of the public will have and transsexual residents can use the bathroom of the gender they identify. some members against the ordinance said they did not see the need for it, others said opponents were not heard. tonight was not a fair hearing, it was one side or not. we heard from lgbt, we never heard from the other side. and i will not i will not impose my will on other people. both sides had an opportunity to be heard and to push in their own way. and i stood up for non-discrimination and to treat everyone equally with dignity and respect. reporter: and now the question is, what will the general assembly do? the governor has said if the charlotte passes the with lawmakers in raleigh. happens starting tomorrow, guys. for now we re live in charlotte, coleen harry, wbtv on your side. thank you. molly. we want to tell you how all of the council members voted it was 7-4. mayor jennifer roberts voted in favor of the ordinance with al austin. james mitchell, julie icesle
increase the amount of co-2 that is put into the atmosphere every year because you re taking an center 40 mile round trip with each garbage truck everyday and with going to translate to 6 thousand miles added green house gas emissions and that s got to be taking into account so for this reason it is improper for the committee and the city to do this without an environmental review and permanent negative debilitation is adopted okay. thank you. next project sponsor maybe someone from the department of environment yeah. good morning, commissioners i m jack as our coordinator with the department of the environment i m representing the department on this project i want to address some concerns raised about disposal quantity and correct the record on a record submitted on this issue regards to the project and the negative analysis when you starter by saying we consider the number and tieflz e types of trucks analyzed in a negative deck to be conservative that s the 50 trick
outside of this contract not relevant to who is coasted under the proposed project which relevant is ecology disprobation officers this is in the second table those numbers are incorrect they include other tons at ultimate ma and those entities have the distribution demolition what s been pertinent is the material that ecology is send to ultimately mount i m going to pass around a correction to that table that shows the sway report is incorrect it went out in 2013, in fact, it went down during that entire period bear with me i ll pass this out there s one here we can make copies of that. i ll see so in that table you ll see the disposal has gone down from 2008 to 2013 in the sway report on page 6 shows the trend of disposal dramatically droppings from 2001 and 2011 and stopping there and one year as an anomaly and zeroing in on that that was from 2012 to 2013 when the table shows the disposal continues to go down so those trendlines and the basis of the entire aushlt u argu
entities have the distribution demolition what s been pertinent is the material that ecology is send to ultimately mount i m going to pass around a correction to that table that shows the sway report is incorrect it went out in 2013, in fact, it went down during that entire period bear with me i ll pass this out there s one here we can make copies of that. i ll see so in that table you ll see the disposal has gone down from 2008 to 2013 in the sway report on page 6 shows the trend of disposal dramatically droppings from 2001 and 2011 and stopping there and one year as an anomaly and zeroing in on that that was from 2012 to 2013 when the table shows the disposal continues to go down so those trendlines and the basis of the entire aushlt u argument is incorrect i ve got the trend. try to leave it up there. thank you. so just so the audience we have 2008. thank you. and didn t look at in my eyes that s unfocused maybe my eye sight can you in fact this. that s the s