this term, and how could this alter now? we can look at the jobs case, the abortion case is a great example of this. mississippi bans abortion, after six weeks, after 15 weeks. this is a direct violation of roe v. wade, so direct, that a conservative republican appointed district judge, and a conservative-controlled fifth circuit, both took mississippi s law and threw it on the whale, that s how obviously violets evolve roe v. wade the mississippi ban is, but the supreme court, 6 to 3 conservative, at least for conservatives on the through supreme court decided, no no no they want to hear that case, they want to argue about that case, this is a case that would never be in front of a split core, or a liberal court. but it is absolutely in front of a conservative, core so however it comes down, whether it s merely a rollback of roe v. wade, a weakening of roe v. wade, that kind of gutted the voting rights act from the inside out.
judge and the conservative controlled fifth circuit took mississippi s law and through it out on a rail. that s how obviously violaing it is. the supreme court, 6-3 conservative, four conseratives decided they want to hear that case. they want to argue about that case. this is a case that would never be in front of a split court or a liberal court but is absolutely in front of a conservative court. however it comes down, whether it s merely a roll back of roe v. wade, a weakening, the way they gutted the voting rights act from the inside out, whether it s that or complete overturning of roe v. wade as mississippi asked for, it s all the way over here. we are fighting over what the right wants to fight about because if we weren t, this case wouldn t be here. do you think that the court should be expanded? yes. by a lot.