terror attacks exactly like we saw in san bernardino and to blend in before they mount the attack with the larger population and instruct them don t carry around the car ran and don t go to mosque or appear to be an observant muslim and we will call you when it s time to strike. they hope to overwhelm the american law enforcement enforcement and intelligence with so many plots the system will collapse and they will take full advantage of that. we need to re-evaluate, robert, in this society, the cultural clash, whether or not our immigration problem, our immigration laws, our visa laws. do we need to go back and re-evaluate evaluate? absolutely. there needs to be a drastic overhaul. many jihad terrorists have gotten through the visa program as well as the refugee
and getting isis. as jeb bushel wently pointed out eloquently pointed out, we are facing grave threats right now. at least they re having conversations. i don t know if this is a bad thing for the republican party, i think it s a good thing. kennedy: well, it s a bad thing for jeb bush, certainly. the worst place he can be is on the ropes. when you put him on the defensive, he performs so badly, and he also performs badly when he embraces his brother s record. this is a person who s trying to differentiate himself by saying they call me jeb, meaning they don t include my last name, bush, but here he is mired in the bush name. and the other thing that i don t appreciate from trump, how easy is it to say, you know, if i were president in 1941 pearl harbor wouldn t have happened. if i were president in 1916, we wouldn t have gone into world war i. it is such but we do need tougher visa laws. andrea: sandra hit the nail on the held though, it puts jeb in two positions he doesn t do w
education, makes sense for working moms and dads and children so we can get to a better future. when you look at demographic shifts they re returning against the republican party so marco rubio is talking about immigration. would you sign on in the house to the gang of 8 immigration plan? are you for a path to citizenship. first of all we had with us today a graduate student at george washington university. he s in the engineering school there. and our visa laws are so antiquated we re going about vesting in her education. she s an extremely smart individual from china. she can t stay here after her degree is done. understood. for the 11 million people in the country illegally, would you join marco rubio for a path to citizenship. what i talked about today is the fact that we have got to go and deal with this issue. and i said that the best place to start is with children.
and as the new york times points out, it eliminates another visa category entirely. the visas set aside for people from countries with low immigration rates to the united states. so the 55,000 stem visas would come at the expense of 55,000 diversity visas. that s a zero sum gain. the elimination of diversity visas would primary affect immigrants from african countries. but despite the discriminatory nature of the bill, republicans insist it s going to create jobs and they are calling out the democrats opposition to the legislation. once again, the house is taking the lead on legislation that is going to help create jo jobs. we believe as this was the first step forward in terms of trying to address the need for modernization in our visa laws. the democrats had two years to do something about immigration reform.
and as the new york times points out, it eliminates another visa category entirely. the visas set aside for people from countries with low immigration rates to the united states. so the 55,000 stem visas would come at the expense of 55,000 diversity visas. that s a zero sum gain. the elimination of diversity visas would primary affect immigrants from african countries. but despite the discriminatory nature of the bill, republicans insist it s going to create jobs and they are calling out the democrats opposition to the legislation. once again, the house is taking the lead on legislation that is going to help create jobs. we believe as this was the first step forward in terms of trying to address the need for modernization in our visa laws. the democrats had two years to do something about immigration reform.