heavily politicized and used for former president trump s personal vindications, personal decisions, political reasons. so we, you know, certainly have seen the white house really try to separate itself from the ag and his pursuit of charges. frank, you were talking about the gear. we also know they had strategies. they had tactics. they had a game plan. what are we learning about these militia groups and who it is that s joining them? well, what is most disturbing and sobering perhaps about the oath keepers in particular is the fact that they are coming largely from the ranks of former military, former police. even some active duty. we already know that one out of ten of the defendants arrested for the violence on january 6th has some military affiliation. we know that is what oath
more california pragmatist. judge kavanaugh is a formalist. i think of the the 14 times that the supreme court has endorsed an opinion by judge kavanaugh. justice kennedy was in majority of those decisions. i think it s suggest lot of overlap between justice kennedy and judge kavanaugh and the mainstream of american legal thought. i want to point your attention to one of those vindications. that s the 2001 heller decision that of course judge kavanaugh wrote the dissent for. he said those second amendment constitutional right that do includes semiautomatic weapons in that case. supreme court disregarded that ban on semis. i want to ask you as we move forward to 2018 and what data shows is uptick in mass gun
notably the $50-a-night condo setup he had in washington, d.c.. if we have it, maybe we can put this up, the list of organizations and agencyings investigating scott agencies investigating scott pruitt. you have the office of inspector general, house oversight and immigration reform committee, government accountability office, white house office of management and budget. some vindications, some violations, and some ongoing probes. do these new reviews make him any more vulnerable? i think other than the house, the others are statutorily required to look into the allegations finding their ways into the newspapers. this was going to happen. he is vulnerable. this is why the ethics bodies exist in the first place, to let you know that if you start stepping wrong, there are people paid to wake up, reads the newspapers, listen read the newspapers, listen to what s going on in the government, and launch probes about things that may be going wrong. especially some alleged retaliation wh
what if other companies say we re going to plow it into stock. would you be disappointed if you did that? i sat on the ways and means committee and the conference committee and produced the final product we. have we have heard companies coming to us about how they re going to move back to the united states. how they re going to create jobs and reinvest if their people. over and over, they have told us they re going to raise wages. a lot of our analysis that we ve done has been based off of those projections. looking at tax cuts in history and what happened and how companies and families reacted. so this is based on all of these projections we have, based on knowledge that we already have of vindications that they ve given us and they will make their people s lives better. neil: you hope. i can remember the bush tax cuts and the temporary reprieve, the tax break to bring that money home, a lot didn t do that. maybe there s more pressure for them to do that. but in other words, you r
missouri law is right now, i m not surprised by the verdict. i am disappointed, though. the prosecutors felt they had a strong case, especially given video evidence, the audio evidence, the dna evidence. so we were hopeful that the system would work this time. what you re seeing is people taking to the streets to voice their displeasure and feeling once again that the system is not working for average citizens. ed, this was captured on video are you surprised that police cams and do you believe it s going to lead to more convictions or vindications for police officers? i hoping cameras lead to more transparency. there has been a different kind of presence with law enforcement and the national guard here. there s a lot more room for the protesters to be peaceful, but, look, i was republican chairman as you mentioned. the judge was a republican