be the overall law of the land, it protects our individuality, freedom and civil society, in many ways we live in a post constitutional america, those waving the constitution today on january 6 committee have been major participants in its demise. let s say you go to a court of law, there is no judge. there is no jury. you don t have a lawyer. you can t call witnesses. you can t provide exculpatory evidence, you cannot be heard, you have to sit and watch. let s say jury was chosen by nancy pelosi, don t worry it is bipartisan. with 7 democrats, two republicans, the media taking pictures, rolling the cameras, taking notes. as scribes. for the prosecution. the prosecution, being the jury. then reporting, we have new finding, new information. not a perfect parallel, but good enough. that is what has been going on with the january 6 committee, nancy pelosi chose every member, they had to past her test,s which were loyalty to her. nancy pelosi has not been questioned once about he
Credit for 500,000. He basically doubles the amount he can borrow against his apartment. He later uses that money, he says, to pay Stormy Daniels in october 2016. And Rudy Giuliani has told us there are several other issues that he settled for trump and that he was reimbursed for. It is possible, though we dont know how he spent the remaining amount in his increased credit line that he may have used that for some of these other issues and thats one of the things thats under investigation. Thats such a Key Line Saying mr. Cohen resolved other problems similarly for mr. Trump. How significant is that . We have Rudy Giuliani giving a variety of figures about how much money was used here, when it was used. Walk us three visavis the size of those payments. Rudy giuliani said he was getting north of 400,000 for a year of Retainer Payments and
that was to reimburse him for things he took care of. It leaves open the possibility of up to another couple hundred thousand dollars that he might hav
u.s. supreme court rehnquist said enough is enough. the rogue florida supreme court, kept changing the election laws in violation of article ii. is it your duty as president of the senate overseeing the process, and vice president of the united states, to accept the counting of electors even if you know that the federal constitution has been violated? didn t you take an oath to this the constitution of the united states, doesn t this supercede anything else. i m not bringing this up to criticize anyone, this matter is more complicated than this committee would have you believe, what they seek to do is create criminal predicates that donald trump knew that vice presidentt pence knew what he wanted him to do, but he
texas. we go to the convention floor at the kay bailey hutchinson convention center in dallas. i want to ask you what the reaction was to kay bailey hutchison scenter in dallas, an what is the reaction to the speech that we saw yesterday delivered by president trump? absolutely. so today, it is very crowded in the exhibition hall. yesterday, as you mentioned trump was here, but there was a big portion where there was not a lot of people in here, but over 815 acres of space has been crowded throughout the day. i spoke to the family, and three generations, 14 years old from the grandson to 75 years old about what they thought about what trump said and the father said he is not liking that trump has flip-flop edped a lot. he says that trump s twitter to use his words is weird and takes away from the message when him and the vice presidentt is
washington, the conversations with people close to donald trump might havemb occurred, as we believe we know they did in the case of general flynn who then proceeded to mislead that the vice presidentt about those conversations.en the reason we know about them is there had to have been surveillance of the russian ambassador and general flynn caught up in that. we know that happened and we know there was probably a criminal leak of that information, which is why we know about it. the idea that a president would be able to cause a wiretapped to occur with it illegally not supposed to occur without theca permission of the court, seems a touch far-fetched and that there s certainly no evidence that president obama because of this to happen. there are people who think that he gives a wink and a nod to the right people and these things would not go on without his t knowledge, i don t think that s necessarily true. t i think this kind of thing can go on without his knowledge at least up until