Vet Council News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Vet council. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Vet Council Today - Breaking & Trending Today
But im inquiring how many people are on this committee 6. 6. Well, the maximum is 7. Yeah. Sorry theres also provision for 2 superintendant appointments so actually is it brings to total 9. So he gets 2 and we get 9. It was how it was written. So its the capacity for 9 we currently have 6 and they serve a term of how long . Two years ago not to exceed four years so you could have a 2 year or 20 20 year terms not to exceed four. You can choose that. So it could potentially be two, two year terms. Do we have any people that are currently set to cough this committee the board didnt appropriate anyone. No one was appointed until late 2010. So currently, the 6 michigans members of the committee that are seated all have the same start date sometime in 2010. So they and they were all reappointed by the board in 2012. We voted on the slate. So theyre in their second two year term so in 2014 we could see an x disof all members. So why dont we wait until 2014 when we all would get an assigned se ....
Year or 20 20 year terms not to exceed four. You can choose that. So it could potentially be two, two year terms. Do we have any people that are currently set to cough this committee the board didnt appropriate anyone. No one was appointed until late 2010. So currently, the 6 michigans members of the committee that are seated all have the same start date sometime in 2010. So they and they were all reappointed by the board in 2012. We voted on the slate. So theyre in their second two year term so in 2014 we could see an x disof all members. So why dont we wait until 2014 when we all would get an assigned seat or appointment. Because there is one open seat now and the question is how this all started ways because we were trying to figure out who got the appointment. So why cant the superintendent do that. Because he has two. So we each get one and he gets two. Right and so out of the 7 or the 9. Those are both open to it. 3 open seats so were going to try to fill two open seats by 2014 . ....
It was how it was written. So its the capacity for 9 we currently have 6 and they serve a term of how long . Two years ago not to exceed four years so you could have a 2 year or 20 20 year terms not to exceed four. You can choose that. So it could potentially be two, two year terms. Do we have any people that are currently set to cough this committee the board didnt appropriate anyone. No one was appointed until late 2010. So currently, the 6 michigans members of the committee that are seated all have the same start date sometime in 2010. So they and they were all reappointed by the board in 2012. We voted on the slate. So theyre in their second two year term so in 2014 we could see an x disof all members. So why dont we wait until 2014 when we all would get an assigned seat or appointment. Because there is one open seat now and the question is how this all started ways because we were trying to figure out who got the appointment. So why cant the superintendent do that. Because he has ....
Initialing studies we were going to do a random drawing for who was going to get that one appointment and what we said in a long consideration is that we should do a random courthouses so each board member can have something to say. What if one of the mens left or resigned early so it seems like just to do it once or do it altogether if youre going to do the random you know the 3 Board Members that are up any objection and the next Board Members well get the second set which make sense oh, lets just do a random for everybody and you get stuck on a seat but that way you have a staggered system it coincides with reelections. Yeah. I think that was discussed and theres different ways like seniority and ways we couldnt come up with a system that made more sense but randomly seemed like it made more sense. If we did is in a way of people that are terminating out or not terminating o ....
Confirmed by the board. We confirmed the current folks but the interpretation was that the board would have to vote as a board to remove the person from the committee. We all agreed there is a process for removing somebody so we did ask ms. Pullman to draft the policy to clarify the issue. But mime interpretation was of the current q ta members that should that person or any commissioner have a conversation with the person and that person not wanting to step down until the commissioner who holds the seat leaves the board if i may i had that understanding as well. I said that it would be a conversation between the commissioner and the person sitting in the seat we said absolutely and its perfectly appropriate to have that conversation. So in this case you couldnt remove the person by have a conversation with the person urging them to resign. Asking them very politely. But you could not formally ask them to leave. I wasnt insnaut anything but again to let ms. Random i dont know who i wou ....