morning, everyone. you re live in judiciary committee will begin girl and is expected to push back against gop attacks on the justice department. and gop claims i am that the doj is weaponized against donald trump. also, opening statements are underway in the trial of the president s son, hunter biden, on three felony gun charges, but there are already some developments in sayyed that courtroom will bring you and president biden is about to announce an executive order on illegal immigration, cracking down on the flow of migrants or false the southern border. the move is controversial. it s drawing fire from republicans, no surprise, but even from border patrol agents will find out why. but first let s go to paul reaches outside the courthouse in delaware where hunter biden s trial is starting. paul, you ve got some breaking news about the jury, what just happened that s right. even before opening statements got underway this morning, we already lost a juror now, this ju
you re concerned about. now, you re, you were a judge once nominated the highest court in our country. when you were a judge, i m just curious. did you ever make political donations to partisan candidates? no. no. and you didn t because that would create the potential appear appearance of impropriety. i didn t because there s a federal rule. oh, are in federal judges for making contributions. right. but but under that same theory of attacks on the judicial process, like shouldn t someone be owed like a jury of their peers and a judge that s non-biased rather than getting a judge from your political opponents donor file. i m well aware that you re not asking a hypothetical. you re asking me to comment and a verdict jury verdict in a another jurisdiction which has to be respected. i won t comment on it. that case is still ongoing. the defense attorney i hadn t asked you about the verdict yet. we re getting there. i was i was talking to about the judge and so let me ask you th
kim came across as imo joint remorseful, that s number one what she wanted to convey but she had problems in her testimony that i think as a result of this conviction, first off the training. this is a 26-year-old veteran who got on stan and testified she didn t remember her training on the taser. he didn t fire a taser her entire career or remember what she was trained on specific principles at that incident. that is number one. also on the gun versus taser, a 50% difference in weight and we saw two days ago before the verdict jury wanted the gun and there was a problem too. when you have two sides, different colors and weights, problems she had.