Page 13 - Vapid Pen News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Vapid pen. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Vapid Pen Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Course president obama wants his nominee to get an up or down vote, just as he wanted to sotomayor but he was somebody who joined in the filibuster of justice alito when he was up. republicans have avoided those kinds of filibusters. she would have to set off by invertence or mistake a real stink bomb in these hearings to bring about the atmosphere in which republicans would have a filibuster in my view. megyn: we ll await for a possible stink bomb and a hollow charade. we re watching for all of that. we re watching for vapid, hollow, we ve got it covered. we ll talk with juan williams and steve hayes. we re minutes away from the elena kagan hearing beginning. our special coverage continues when we come back. ....
another quote, finely tuned political antenna, and a political heart. miss kagan, has called erin barack her judicial hero. is he widely acknowledged as someone who took an activist approach to judging. you ll be hearing more of those, but the problem isn t the attacks in the gop. the problem is these hearings have become somewhat maddening an farpz none other than kagan herself said as much in the university of chicago law review when she described account confirmation process as a vapid and hollow that charade in which repetition of platitudes has replaced discussion of viewpoints. since she wrote those words, it has gotten worse. i think we have john roberts largely to blame. it was lobts contended that a good judge is a complete political blank slate with no views whatsoever, an umpire as he very famously put it. ....
Necessarily agree with everything he thinks and who are not going to reinforce every thought he has but challenge him and help him see things in a different way. the problem is nobody knows anymore what barack obama thinks. what barack obama has done is make him seven an empty vessel once again. because he was so passive over the last two years failing to articulate a rationale for what should have been transformation he let the tea party, one of the most vapid, purile groups out there take over those voices for transformation and now he is embracing their agenda rather than standing up and saying this is what i believe in. and i think that is why people are gasping saying, wait a minute, bill daley is a wonderful guy. nobody will speak ill of him as a person but ideology matters. politics is about ideology and either this president knows how to stand up and fight for it or he doesn t. and if he doesn t, then why will people care about whether it s him or george bush and frankly peop ....
I want my straws. good evening from new york, republicans opposing the supreme court nomination of elena kagan are going to lose. but as the confirmation hearings kicked off today, republicans show they might still snatch defeat from the jaws of more defeat. our fifth story this evening. never mind the nominee. the gop went after a judicial icon instead. but first, the formalities. elena kagan, solicitor general of the united states who argues government cases before the supreme court in her opening statement today did nothing to change what she herself has called the vapid and hollow nature of confirmation hearings, assuring critics in the vaguest most unobjectionable of terms of her impartiality. what i ve learned most is that no one has a monopoly on truth or wisdom. i ve learned that we make progress by listening to each other. across every apparent political or ideological divide. ....
Feinstein, because in 1995, as you well know, kagan wrote a law review article in which she said this: subsequent hearings have presented to the public a vapid and holly charade in which repetition of platitudes has replaced discussion of viewpoints. now i know there is going to be a lot of joking on the committee. well, she said that when she wasn t a nominee and stuff. why not hold her to accounts and say, and press her to be more forth coming in her views? i believe this is going to come up at the hearing and she is very likely to be pressed for her views. chris: what if she says, well, i doesn t matter. we all read it. it was very precise. she expressed her very strong views that a nominee should be more forth coming, we should be more pressing in our questions and chris: so you re going to hold her to that? i suspect members will hold her to this. chris: senator graham? well, i expect that she will ....