undoubtedly result in ukraine losing the bipartisan ports. it is thus far maintained. it the implication is, that would be unexcept both said something almost identical to that. to restore ukraine s independence, and russia must leave ukraine. this has been and should continue to be a bipartisan u.s. foreign policy goal. in other words, washington may have two parties but only one position on ukraine is allowed here. trump doesn t have it. his phone call was unacceptable because it might prevent america from automatically unthinkingly spending billions of dollars over many years to prop up a country that most americans could not find o on the globe at gunpoint. there s just one problem with this arrangement. voters disagree. we know this because when he ran three years ago, president trump didn t hide how he felt about u.s. foreign policy. he told voters that america was involved in too many pointless wars but he criticized that then president obama for having
likely be interpreted in a bipartisan play. it is thus far maintained. the application is that would be unacceptable. taylor said something almost identical to that. here it is. to restore ukraine s independence, russia must leave ukraine. this has been and should continue to be a bipartisan u.s. foreign policy goal. so in other words, washington may have two parties, but only one position on ukraine is allowed here. and trump doesn t have it. this phone call wasn t acceptable because it might prevent america from automatically unthinkingly spending billions of dollars over many years to prop up a country that most americans could not findri on on the glot gunpoint. there s just one problem with this arrangement. the voters disagree. we know this because when he ran three years ago, president trump didn t hide how he felt about u.s. foreign policy. he told voters that america was involved in too many pointless wars. he criticized the then