A special bond issue will be offered to voters to decide on more improvements in the district.If approved, the district will make improvements at every campus, build a new transportation facility and expand academic pathways
accountability because we re talking about a lot of taxpayer money. we have to make that it stood up so in a way that s absolutely clear why dollars are going where they re going and that it s spent well. when you and i sat down there was an issue that was peshl lating and the supply chain issue and supply chains in america are mostly own asked operateds they should be and they ran on s bipartisan infrastructure bill. now that s passed. in what wi will americans see the benefit of the infrastructure bill on the alleviation of the supply chain bottlenecks that we have in the country right now. i ll give you a couple of examples and one is at the ports themselves where we can fund projects that will help upgrade technology that can be used to better coordinate all of the different entities and vehicles that are moving around to get a container off of a ship, off the
first is that it has to be a compatibility thing. dealing with technology. about technology and maintenance of equipment that allows to use other avenues of the government. which of course cost money. it s labor. to help upgrade technology and keep technology and equipment ready to be used. it s not about construction. it s not about a wall. that will be one legal challenge. the second will be that dhs says that the bulk of the drug interdiction is done at ports of entry. how can you argue you need to use the extra methods because it s so important what s happening on foot when it s not what dhs says. it will be complicated. we have the other legal avenue. the national emergency act of 1976. the good news for the president is there are no parameters on what counts as emergency. only something special and extraordinary. now you could argue the wall is neither an emergency nor
thing. it deals with technology. almost all of these are about technology and maintenance of equipment that allows the secretary of defense to use other avenues of the government that always costs money because it s labor, to help upgrade technology and keep technology and equipment ready to be used. that s what it is about. it s not about construction. it s not about a wall. that s going to be one legal challenge. the second will be that dhs says that the bulk of the drug interdiction is done at the ports of entry. so then how can you argue that you need to use these extra methods because it s so important what s happening on foot when that s not what dhs says. so it s going to be complicated. all right. so now we have the other legal avenue. the national emergencies act of 1976. the good news for the president is there are no parameters on what counts as an emergency. they define it only as something special and extraordinary. now you could argue the wall is neither an emergency nor
i find that i you can t get my head around that. as frustrated as you are with this, you can only imagine our frustration at the cemetery. arlington cemetery was funded and is funded to this day as a separate government agency. you ve been given over $7 million to upgrade technology. not all of that went to upgrading i.t. we re maintaining fiber optics and our work stations, computer stations. we have i.t. staff on board to assist the staff. all that rolls into that. yeah, but with all due respect, sir, the top priority should be identifying and accurately categorizing in modern times and not using 3 x 5 cards for the people who are the national heroes of this country.