Live Breaking News & Updates on Uot Mangelen Said He Marcos 39 Conviction Became Final And Executory Under The Nirc Quot Is Enough To Disqualify Him As Code

Stay updated with breaking news from Uot mangelen said he marcos 39 conviction became final and executory under the nirc quot is enough to disqualify him as code. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Petitioner in dismissed DQ case vs. Marcos files MR

MANILA - Abubakar Mangelen, one of the petitioners in the dismissed consolidated disqualification cases against presidential candidate Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. on Monday filed a motion for reconsideration. Mangelen asked the Commission on Elections (Comelec) First Division to reverse its February 10 ruling junking the three disqualification cases filed against the son of the late former President Ferdinand Marcos for lack of merit. The petitioner reiterated that the respondent should not be allowed to run in the May 9 national and local elections for his failure to file the necessary income tax returns (ITRs) from 1982 to 1985. "Clearly, respondent was convicted of failure to file the necessary Tax Returns from 1982 to 1985. The Honorable Court of Appeals removed the penalty of imprisonment imposed by the Honorable Regional Trial Court but replaced it with an alternative penalty of fine which was then imposable under the NIRC (National Internal Revenue Code)," ....

Aimee Ferolino , Ferdinand Bongbong Marcos Jr , Marlon Casquejo , Bonifacio Ilagan , Ferdinand Marcos , Abubakar Mangelen , National Internal Revenue Code , Commission On Elections Comelec First Division , First Division , Honorable Regional Trial Court , Honorable Court , President Ferdinand Marcos , Tax Returns , Commissioner Aimee Ferolino , Commissioner Marlon Casquejo , Manila Abubakar Mangelen , Ne Of The Petitioners In Dismissed Consolidated Disqualification Cases Against Presidential Candidate Ferdinand Quot Bongbong Marcos Jr On Monday Fileda Motion For Reconsideration Mangelen Asked Commission Elections Comelec First Division To Reverse Its February 10 Ruling Junking Three Filed Son Late Former President Lack Merit Petitioner Reiterated That Respondent Should Not Be Allowed Run May 9 National And Local His Failure File Necessary Income Tax Returns Itrs From 1982 1985 Clearly , Espondent Was Convicted Of Failure To File The Necessary Tax Returns From 1982 1985 Honorable Court Appeals Removed Penalty Imprisonment Imposed By Regional Trial But Replaced It With An Alternative Fine Which Then Imposable Under Nirc National Internal Revenue Code , Uot Mangelen Said He Marcos 39 Conviction Became Final And Executory Under The Nirc Quot Is Enough To Disqualify Him As Code , Id Not Distinguish Whether The Sentence Is Fine Or Imprisonment Quot That Respondent Failed To File His Itr Income Tax Return For Four Taxable Years This Tantamount Evasion He Did Pay Correct Amount Of Even If Government Withheld , His Did Not Exempt The Respondent To File Itr Because He Might Have Other Sources Of Income Report Aside From Salary Needed Taxes Withheld Out Were Sufficient And Gross Exceeded Personal Exemption Non Filing Is Tantamount Tax Evasion , N Offense Punishable Under The Old Nirc , Uot He Added Said The Offense Quot Is No Doubt Involved Moral Turpitude For Four Times , Espondent Was Convicted For Failure To File Itr Moral Turpitude Implies Something Immoral In Itself , Egardless Of The Fact That It Is Punishable By Law Or Not Respondent Hada Duty To File But He Opted Taxes Are Lifeblood Government Without Which Cannot Pay Its Expenses In Delivering Basic Services People , Uot He Said Quot Ultimately ,

Petitioner in dismissed DQ case vs. Marcos files MR

MANILA - Abubakar Mangelen, one of the petitioners in the dismissed consolidated disqualification cases against presidential candidate Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos, on Monday filed a motion for reconsideration. Mangelen asked the Commission on Elections (Comelec) First Division to reverse its February 10 ruling junking the three disqualification cases filed against the son of the late former President Ferdinand Marcos for lack of merit. The petitioner reiterated that the respondent should not be allowed to run in the May 9 national and local elections for his failure to file the necessary income tax returns (ITRs) from 1982 to 1985. "Clearly, respondent was convicted of failure to file the necessary Tax Returns from 1982 to 1985. The Honorable Court of Appeals removed the penalty of imprisonment imposed by the Honorable Regional Trial Court but replaced it with an alternative penalty of fine which was then imposable under the NIRC (National Internal Revenue Code)," M ....

Aimee Ferolino , Ferdinand Bongbong Marcos , Marlon Casquejo , Bonifacio Ilagan , Ferdinand Marcos , Abubakar Mangelen , National Internal Revenue Code , Commission On Elections Comelec First Division , First Division , Honorable Regional Trial Court , Honorable Court , President Ferdinand Marcos , Tax Returns , Commissioner Aimee Ferolino , Commissioner Marlon Casquejo , Manila Abubakar Mangelen , Ne Of The Petitioners In Dismissed Consolidated Disqualification Cases Against Presidential Candidate Ferdinand Quot Bongbong Marcos , N Monday Fileda Motion For Reconsideration Mangelen Asked The Commission On Elections Comelec First Division To Reverse Its February 10 Ruling Junking Three Disqualification Cases Filed Against Son Of Late Former President Ferdinand Marcos Lack Merit Petitioner Reiterated That Respondent Should Not Be Allowed Run In May 9 National And Local His Failure File Necessary Income Tax Returns Itrs From 1982 1985 Quot Clearly , Espondent Was Convicted Of Failure To File The Necessary Tax Returns From 1982 1985 Honorable Court Appeals Removed Penalty Imprisonment Imposed By Regional Trial But Replaced It With An Alternative Fine Which Then Imposable Under Nirc National Internal Revenue Code , Uot Mangelen Said He Marcos 39 Conviction Became Final And Executory Under The Nirc Quot Is Enough To Disqualify Him As Code , Id Not Distinguish Whether The Sentence Is Fine Or Imprisonment Quot That Respondent Failed To File His Itr Income Tax Return For Four Taxable Years This Tantamount Evasion He Did Pay Correct Amount Of Even If Government Withheld , His Did Not Exempt The Respondent To File Itr Because He Might Have Other Sources Of Income Report Aside From Salary Needed Taxes Withheld Out Were Sufficient And Gross Exceeded Personal Exemption Non Filing Is Tantamount Tax Evasion , N Offense Punishable Under The Old Nirc , Uot He Added Said The Offense Quot Is No Doubt Involved Moral Turpitude For Four Times , Espondent Was Convicted For Failure To File Itr Moral Turpitude Implies Something Immoral In Itself , Egardless Of The Fact That It Is Punishable By Law Or Not Respondent Hada Duty To File But He Opted Taxes Are Lifeblood Government Without Which Cannot Pay Its Expenses In Delivering Basic Services People ,